Re: [BEHAVE] draft-korhonen-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-00

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 18 October 2010 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462813A6DB9 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mprbliXWJbG for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258303A6BF6 for <behave@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAO9VvEyrRN+J/2dsb2JhbACUcoxacaNRnF6FSQSEVA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,346,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="606001433"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2010 21:16:27 +0000
Received: from dwingWS ([10.32.240.194]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9ILGRE4016634; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:16:27 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Rémi Després' <remi.despres@free.fr>, 'jouni korhonen' <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, 'Teemu Savolainen' <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>
References: <C053E16B-6556-416F-83CB-EFCB1E1FE172@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <C053E16B-6556-416F-83CB-EFCB1E1FE172@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:16:27 -0700
Message-ID: <302e01cb6f09$ba1888f0$2e499ad0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: ActuwBLl9iW9pJ4ERTijAccCgNbNiQASSzBg
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'Behave WG' <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] draft-korhonen-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-00
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:15:09 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Rémi Després
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 5:29 AM
> To: jouni korhonen; Teemu Savolainen
> Cc: Behave WG
> Subject: [BEHAVE] draft-korhonen-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-00
> 
> Hi, Jouni and Teemu,
> 
> 1.
> As previously discussed on this list, this draft is IMHO important.
> I hope it can quickly be discussed and become a WG document.
> 
> 2.
> In the list of CONs of section 4.1.2, it has "Requires a host resolver
> changes and a mechanism/additions to the host resolver API (or flags,
> hints etc) to deliver a note to the querying application that the
> address is synthesized and what is the NSP prefix length."
> 
> An alternative, that IMHO should be considered, is that the resolver
> API directly presents an IPv4 address to the application. Thus, in my
> understanding, dual-stack-compatible applications wouldn't need to be
> modified.

You mean, presents an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address to the application 
(::ffff:1.1.1.1)?

-d


> Regards,
> RD
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave