Re: [BEHAVE] NAT64 mapping behaviour w.r.t. scaling

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 01 December 2009 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B96A3A67FC for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:38:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZwTW2YUW2Kmq for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:38:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2043A67DF for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:38:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balaise.nomis80.org (modemcable245.152-21-96.mc.videotron.ca [96.21.152.245]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8FB720806; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:38:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B14F209.7050100@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:38:01 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-3.9.b4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0b4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
References: <4AFF20DC.2050308@viagenie.ca> <4B02FC62.9010309@viagenie.ca><4B0E9061.40107@ericsson.com> <4B0E9744.4080606@viagenie.ca> <04e301ca71ec$5b6dbf20$c3f0200a@cisco.com> <4B14E601.7020500@it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <4B14E601.7020500@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: behave@ietf.org, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] NAT64 mapping behaviour w.r.t. scaling
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:38:10 -0000

On 12/01/2009 04:46 AM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
> So, this has been discussed several tiems already and the proposed way
> forward was:
> - define nat64 as complying with the behave requirements
> - define another doc where the behave requirements are contrasted witht
> eh reality of CGNs and identify which requirements can be lifted.

Oh, good. I certainly remember the discussions, but I don't remember 
that a decision had been made.

> makes sense?

Certainly!

(But let's not talk about CGNs as if they were something completely 
different. They're not. It's just about scaling, which is a continuum.)

Simon
-- 
DNS64 open-source   --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server    --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0           --> http://www.vcarddav.org