Re: [BEHAVE] adopt STUN test vectors?

Has it been discussed whether the tests vectors could just be added as an
appendix to rfc3489bis?  It would only amount to about 3 pages of extra
text, and other specs, such as UTF-8 and base64 include such test vectors.

BTW - Wikipedia and I think FINGERPRINT should refer Cyclic Redundancy
Check, as opposed to Circular Redundancy Check.

Cheers,

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Codalogic
http://www.codalogic.com/
=============================================
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
To: <behave@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:43 PM
Subject: [BEHAVE] adopt STUN test vectors?

> We don't have a milestone for STUN test vectors and it probably falls a 
> bit
> outside of the as-written charter, but before we try to change those:  is
> there interest in adopting Remi's "Test vectors for RFC3489bis",
> draft-denis-behave-rfc3489bis-test-vectors-02 as a working group item for
> BEHAVE?  It's 6 pages, please skim it:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-denis-behave-rfc3489bis-test-vectors
> -02.txt
>
> Before adopting it, I will need to get approval from our ADs to add 
> another
> milestone and adjust the charter accordingly.  But I wanted to poll first 
> to
> see if we should try doing that.
>
> Thanks,
> -d
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
> 

_______________________________________________
Behave mailing list
Behave@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave