[bess] Adoption of draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy (was Re: Call for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-01 (extended to Feb 23))

[Thomas Morin <[e-mail]>]

Hi everyone,

draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy is adopted as a working group 
document with the understanding that Jorge's comments from Feb 9th will 
be addressed in a -01.

Can you authors please post the document as-is as 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy and then followup with a revision ?

Many thanks!

-Thomas


2017-02-09, Thomas Morin:
> Hi working group,
>
> Given the two IPR disclosures made very recently [1], this call is
> extended to close on February 23rd.
>
> -Thomas
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hello working group,
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-01 [1] as a working group item.
>
> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
> not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).
>
> This poll runs until **February 23rd**.    [<<<<  updated]
>
> *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
> applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for
> more details).
>
> ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR.
>
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
>
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Martin & Thomas
> bess chairs
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-01