Re: [bess] [IANA #812089] Protocol Action: 'Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-06.txt)

[Ronald Bonica <[e-mail]>]

Hi Amanda,

I have two questions.

The latest version of draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering prefixes is 06. Your reference is RFC-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-03. Does that make a difference?

Also, I assume that this string will be replaced with an RFC number when one is assigned. Is that right?

Otherwise, it looks OK.

                                         Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amanda Baber via RT [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:32 PM
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: [IANA #812089] Protocol Action: 'Covering Prefixes Outbound Route
> Filter for BGP-4' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-
> 06.txt)
> 
> Dear Authors:
> 
> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
> 
> We've completed the IANA Actions for the following RFC-to-be:
> 
> draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-06
> 
> ACTION 1:
> 
> IANA has updated the reference for the following BGP Outbound Route
> Filtering (ORF) Type:
> 
> 65	CP-ORF	[RFC-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-03]
> 
> Please see
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters
> 
> 
> ACTION 2:
> 
> IANA has updated the reference for the following Transitive Opaque
> Extended Community Sub-Type:
> 
> 0x03 	CP-ORF	[RFC-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-03]
> 
> Please see
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities
> 
> 
> Please let us know whether the above IANA Actions look OK. As soon as we
> receive your confirmation, we'll notify the RFC Editor that this document's
> IANA Actions are complete. (If this document has a team of authors, one
> reply on behalf of everyone will suffice.)
> 
> We'll update the reference when the RFC Editor notifies us that they've
> assigned a number.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> IANA Request Specialist
> ICANN