Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 21 August 2017 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884D3132AAF; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PNAX2VRxncaQ; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD1BA132AAE; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8690; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1503345948; x=1504555548; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=oSWlU3Dco+KQL3MDFoZ/Tw3blmp+UyThehJ526g5Xs8=; b=dGLbC2MAoZix9XFpXBAWeRo6lUBucz1jjwtylNDZVhGw3fkM1Q+cqojF xoKYnWAvJcYp7R7a36j1XIMhBhtE4elhJiRXTM2PQE6ZNM4L5V2hPhV3w eyUoaY/7Bp1QCQ9bam27BpWknQpNup+TwRoSuT3j5DKAcYnkBxQXyU1y8 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0A/BAANPJtZ/4ENJK1eGgEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgBAQEBgm9rZIEVB4NwmjKBTJEHhTmCEoVHAhqDdkEWAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQY?= =?us-ascii?q?jVhACAQg/AwICAjAUEQIEAQ0FiU1krwqCJieLOAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAR2DKIICgUyBYysLgnGIBjCCMQWYHYgyApRAkl6WHwElATGBCncVWwGHB3a?= =?us-ascii?q?JD4EPAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,409,1498521600"; d="scan'208,217";a="474248029"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Aug 2017 20:05:47 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7LK5lH3016641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Aug 2017 20:05:47 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:05:47 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:05:47 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree.all@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12
Thread-Index: AQHTFvNSjAEtixCLIESUCrqobB2KyKKPIlIA
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 20:05:46 +0000
Message-ID: <1C29B427-1C0F-4267-ACBD-5DB9A59E9492@cisco.com>
References: <D5BA373E.2160EF%sajassi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5BA373E.2160EF%sajassi@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.25.0.170815
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.74.85]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1C29B4271C0F4267ACBD5DB9A59E9492ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/2FdihPQXSsI6cAFmgNlxTyBiZ64>
Subject: Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 20:05:51 -0000

Ali:

Hi!

So, you’re really only changing the 0x0C – 0xFA range, right?

If my hex is not wrong, you’re missing some pieces below: 0x40-0x7F, and 0xC0-0xCF, which I’m assume remain Unassigned, right?

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On 8/16/17, 5:54 PM, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com<mailto:sajassi@cisco.com>> wrote:

To maximize backward/forward compatibility, let's retain the value for "Experimental Use” and “Reserved” as before per [RFC7385] and reduce the range for Composite tunnel for this draft. So, the changes will be
From existing IANA assignments:
0x0C - 0xFA Unassigned
0xFB - 0xFE Experimental [RFC7385]
0xFF Reserved [RFC7385]
To:
  0x0C – 0x3F Unassigned
  0x80 – 0xBF reserved for composite tunnel
  0xD0 – 0xFA Unassigned
  0xFB - 0xFE Experimental [RFC7385]
  0xFF
 Reserved [RFC7385]