Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR, implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility

["Neeraj Malhotra (nmalhotr)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Also, wanted to re-confirm that all comments during and since the last WGLC (including from RtgDir early review) have been addressed in the latest version.

I am aware of at least two implementations across Cisco and Arrcus.

Thanks,
Neeraj

From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 12:45 AM
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: WGLC, IPR, implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility
Hi WG,

This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-14 [1]. Note that the document already had a WGLC and comments were raised by the WG. These comments are normally addressed by the Authors but feel free to review again and provide feedback.

This poll runs until Tuesday 3rd October.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document, please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.
There is currently no IPR disclosed.

If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2]. Please indicate if you are aware of any implementations.



Thank you,
Stephane, Matthew, Jeffrey

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw