Re: [bess] [sfc] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

luay.jalil@verizon.com Sat, 15 April 2017 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <luay.jalil@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83811293E4; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 00:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=SXyY9jnV; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=cdUCzzVU; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=gUq5w+9o
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lCLN38f03cta; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 00:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FCF1293E3; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 00:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1492242568; x=1523778568; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Jp9c+gXJSEDQeDENxzMsJ9+LAFuyLus3v9HXUeSXmNM=; b=SXyY9jnVHkEhEmi+Dq34LVTmzcu6fystgZ6rKRq79/TJbXcwuwM6BMR3 DlkkxEuKsJlpTJCqOQo2xwbprTlXwsHsI4mefw1NlX4PjR8lRt6poE4N5 oCLtMrqm7+Xv/YVQSUwYOLMVBdar4az2afdZ6wz6/lQ61LuWgYTwqLPlo k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2017 07:49:17 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,203,1488844800"; d="scan'208,217";a="1424730906"
Received: from rogue-10-255-192-101.rogue.vzwcorp.com (HELO atlantis.verizonwireless.com) ([10.255.192.101]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Apr 2017 07:48:51 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1492242531; x=1523778531; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Jp9c+gXJSEDQeDENxzMsJ9+LAFuyLus3v9HXUeSXmNM=; b=cdUCzzVUo4ziCyw2Ci4hw5F78PUVegKZMFypcOUGw9Ft7lUp6wIuaDN/ N/StwloLqtk7iOXo8xBuMZKpGB7emqWT+f3qVwVwxaXhuePsnJ8daWMlP dv0aEa4BbJgz+TNFsVzzUY2RMmi9XleEM86/W+k37RZsCrm8uHDtTz7he s=;
Received: from ranger.odc.vzwcorp.com (HELO mercury.verizonwireless.com) ([10.255.240.27]) by atlantis.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Apr 2017 03:48:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1492242530; x=1523778530; h=to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version:from; bh=Jp9c+gXJSEDQeDENxzMsJ9+LAFuyLus3v9HXUeSXmNM=; b=gUq5w+9oDHqRE9+RWBBaVcgMW4gUv+YR9cLvXRwhYWeQjyBht1kN9eGV hwWRB3UO4G+QXSQFoeuIIUyh4w1SlrMnVYyW7mudXJX9AKw/KgbgHQ1oF nLf5CC1YVxgi5f6wxFJmzi8sAUfFk+xQZqHSmnWAKx7chKcJRYp7w1WcD M=;
From: luay.jalil@verizon.com
X-Host: ranger.odc.vzwcorp.com
Received: from gaalpexhub2.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([10.191.138.196]) by mercury.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 15 Apr 2017 07:48:50 +0000
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA05.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.175) by GAALPEXHUB2.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (10.191.138.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.406.0; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:48:49 -0400
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA07.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.180) by OMZP1LUMXCA05.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.175) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 02:48:48 -0500
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA07.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([144.8.22.180]) by OMZP1LUMXCA07.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([144.8.22.180]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 02:48:48 -0500
To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
CC: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure
Thread-Index: AQHStby3034M0loOcUuHRBcU6IkGnQ==
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:48:48 +0000
Message-ID: <49EF93F5-4278-40CC-B5B8-276BF3038DF8@one.verizon.com>
References: <f307a2de-0aae-7f57-bf7f-8271189a890b@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <f307a2de-0aae-7f57-bf7f-8271189a890b@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.144.60.250]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_49EF93F5427840CCB5B8276BF3038DF8oneverizoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/3sIl7WVwh_uVLjGZzkhITSTq5J4>
Subject: Re: [bess] [sfc] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:49:31 -0000

Support


Luay

From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Reply-To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 1:04 PM
To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: [sfc] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

WG

Given the IPR disclosed [1] against
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for
comment specifically to let people express a revised opinion on how
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane should be pursued in BESS.

This call for comment is open until the 5th of May

Thanks
M&T

[1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_ipr_2980_&d=DwIFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=7yfE7g9ZjpRzGkNuVTidj5c7H2bMIhCLfUwl8WcELSY&m=qN2VxBfuDQTHb9spUcOb6U-0QhNArhH4-TqX_aTjyaw&s=4VuflmQibSX6JGcRHsfv4SgtIIMuNUzVFEdMMccItP8&e=

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_sfc&d=DwIFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=7yfE7g9ZjpRzGkNuVTidj5c7H2bMIhCLfUwl8WcELSY&m=qN2VxBfuDQTHb9spUcOb6U-0QhNArhH4-TqX_aTjyaw&s=u3C3H2GPfolNL2O1q7-SoUfZRNFXGGqXbUo471yGMkU&e=