IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] IPR disclosure notification on spbm-evpn

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 01 October 2015 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB701A049A; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x3vuiqziowZ5; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD07C1A0AF1; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [112.205.86.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28C2318013DA; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>, pals@ietf.org
References: <560CE9D1.7020406@alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <560CFD9D.4030208@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:32:13 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <560CE9D1.7020406@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/3zv1fkH4F6uuCHoZAEPpfrpe-uk>
Subject: Re: [bess] IPR disclosure notification on spbm-evpn
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:32:29 -0000

Martin,

I remember checking back when we were doing the wglc, I had no
concerns, I can't see that that would have changed.

/Loa

PS

It would be good to have a table explaining what the different IPR
disclosures actully means.



On 2015-10-01 16:07, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
> Former L2VPN WG participants,
>
> it was brought to my attention that you were possibly not aware of IPR
> existing against draft-...-spbm-evpn at the times you supported the
> document (Adoption: 10/2013; WGLC: 10/2014) even if it had been
> disclosed prior to adoption (05/2013).
>
> This could be due to a lack of an explicit notification towards the WG
> about this IPR disclosure.
>
> So please have a look at the IPR disclosure [1] and express your opinion
> if any.
>
> Thank you
>
> Martin (as shepherd)
>
> ---
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email