[bess] Request for an expedited WG last call for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args

Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 02:22 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH6gdPxqnYAGCFU0erj+vcvgzWG9iZbJJpSHEL=6Q14-x8YWbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6gdPzm_Nbzma3KJu+Bio0-qkJT4rgh=LFR+e3o2dybt1TjtA@mail.gmail.com> <DU0PR07MB9218AC8A4BC260E34EDA5823EB0AA@DU0PR07MB9218.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <BY3PR08MB7060B78501D49D5DE4BA4EE3F70AA@BY3PR08MB7060.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAH6gdPzkCHFDK1yKRd2A4mN+WnY026cdfZ56swoQTaSiAOcHOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6gdPzkCHFDK1yKRd2A4mN+WnY026cdfZ56swoQTaSiAOcHOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:51:46 +0530
Message-ID: <CAH6gdPzGH15rhEh0oqCrbRwBPWgcx+bUanB+UZyzM_QBxa_FBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004fb89306140e41bf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/4QbQdW0VcKm4EJOwKF2ueEmz-Is>
Subject: [bess] Request for an expedited WG last call for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args
Precedence: list

Hello WG/Chairs,

The authors would like to request for an expedited WGLC for this document
for the same reason as we requested for an expedited adoption - since it
"updates" a WG RFC by clarifying aspects (no new functionality).

We've already reported implementations (prior to WG adoption even).

Thanks,
Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)


On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 11:48 PM Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Cisco (IOS-XR) also has an implementation of this.
>
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 11:16 AM Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <
> jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Nokia has an implementation of draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args in SROS.
>>
>>
>>
>> As Ketan says, it is important to make this work WG adopted as soon as
>> possible so that new implementors become aware of the changes compared to
>> RFC9252.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:25 AM
>> *To: *Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>, bess-chairs@ietf.org <
>> bess-chairs@ietf.org>
>> *Cc: *draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args@ietf.org <
>> draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args@ietf.org>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: Request for an expedited WG adoption call for
>> draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args
>>
>> Hi Ketan
>>
>>
>>
>> If we can do a quick implementation poll for the changes proposed in the
>> draft, that would help.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 15:02
>> *To: *bess-chairs@ietf.org <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
>> *Cc: *draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args@ietf.org <
>> draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args@ietf.org>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>
>> *Subject: *Request for an expedited WG adoption call for
>> draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args
>>
>>
>>
>> *CAUTION:* This is an external email. Please be very careful when
>> clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for
>> additional information.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Chairs,
>>
>>
>>
>> The authors would like to drop this gentle reminder of our request for an
>> expedited WG adoption call for this draft that we had presented at IETF116.
>>
>>
>>
>> The draft is in essence an "errata" for a certain portion our BESS WG
>> RFC9252. The concerned portions of the specification have been in
>> development at various vendors for quite some time now. Interop issues were
>> identified and these clarifications are needed for smooth interop and
>> deployments that are ongoing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>>
>>
>> We had presented
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args/ at the
>> IETF 116.
>>
>>
>>
>> The slides are available at:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/materials/slides-116-bess-draft-trr-bess-srv6-args-00.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> Since this draft aims to fix some issues in the RFC9252 that was
>> published by BESS WG, we had sought feedback/review from the WG and
>> requested the WG chairs for an expedited WG adoption.
>>
>>
>>
>> We also wanted to check if any follow-up was required for the comments
>> that were discussed at the meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>>
>>
>>
>>

[bess] Request for review of draft-trr-bess-bgp-s… Ketan Talaulikar
[bess] Request for an expedited WG adoption call … Ketan Talaulikar
Re: [bess] Request for an expedited WG adoption c… Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Re: [bess] Request for an expedited WG adoption c… Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
Re: [bess] Request for an expedited WG adoption c… Ketan Talaulikar
Re: [bess] Request for an expedited WG adoption c… Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
Re: [bess] Request for an expedited WG adoption c… Wen Lin
[bess] Request for an expedited WG last call for … Ketan Talaulikar
Re: [bess] Request for an expedited WG last call … Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Re: [bess] Request for an expedited WG last call … Ketan Talaulikar