IETF Logo Mail Archive

[bess] Shepherd review comment draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-04

"Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com> Sat, 11 April 2020 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mankamis@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74A43A1921; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=AyVwtC7X; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Ni6wr+Vk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p6AanLyoJLim; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7003A191F; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10609; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1586637655; x=1587847255; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=S3A7QmNGHJMON7aW1FzQLeriPr79zM+uxsycyQNPeAk=; b=AyVwtC7XP2oWw0qZoGIK/2V+7zKnPgBljYmp26mObvlkpwtVcluWOYXR c/0H47DWuYo1am0AZvqE2dyaV51a/rQJS/8BDpwBNVHVb3q1pg8ndrfTN uJrGgPkQqhoZIcD1k2taFUBa+4R/bzgzzPoh29pztkw7M4OcVMW6fSift c=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:18mJ3xGwADKymzziCjcLuZ1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4z1Q3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNVcejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+efvjaS8zGcVZfFRk5Hq8d0NSHZW2ag==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C0DgCEKpJe/4UNJK1mg2YvUAVsWCAECyqEHINGA4pngjqTaIRgglIDVAoBAQEMAQEtAgQBAYREGYF5JDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWAQuFcxYRHQEBNwERAUoCBDAnBA4ngwQBgX5NAy4BpSkCgTmIYnWBMoJ/AQEFhQYYgg4JgTiCYolTGoFBP4ERJwwQimsygiyRF4YKmjMKgkEEl0sdnCaPUZxIAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFXcBVlAYI+UBgNkRaKVXSBKY5BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,372,1580774400"; d="scan'208,217";a="500751851"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Apr 2020 20:40:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03BKesFb006613 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:40:54 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:40:54 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:40:53 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:40:53 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YK/95HHlZx+VnD34NQtnzyH2chB66yyJIKETNsJIc7URRsygdXoegaxPiSSPiPzp0GmZpdJFRrteYwQW9HZeAxekFVustsK6u60h8hIdA5GAQtm1rUks+gfdwFwcCmT13JPCcMEHGoJeGxn9b9bVytQXYysAZbJDAa8IKKlv7PlFFCE9MSZX/MtOKryweRCkJika6MVHfMI4HBk0WTNLtBdaWrQ4FJNLZvbtp0Ra3H7dkEjURI13d3pQiaP3nMn6jUI7uSXZYaNg2V8kv19dBQXws1Nz4iuNRzpt5OG0ZCfC35CrGlSJjBSZTeBD3qZ5As61X51oi1pJ/TfXPg26Hw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=S3A7QmNGHJMON7aW1FzQLeriPr79zM+uxsycyQNPeAk=; b=CgUqwnJAclVJKfx1b4XfoWc5MtMrBbAY3AqJ2mN1xhRxFq2HLaqSxThnUUz7FmG0FhzGB7LkYhlUblGKFDfBssFtJkWT7qBzAYNZODFMZZMwcEtuh+S0IbwGbB2lKsX016zcZ3IBDM42ZzuCn66fbKoGJ4E54X5WT9oDrlI6vKBUuwLezZVACCfm/C8pTczPjojnSx1+kW0cNSVdSfo6H9lQma+/03w6O33G8QFdFQ1d1aD3UMjBrga+BgmLLilJeGgn0HRRgcslj9snT2yGmhRZTqBvvmEHKyo71KG85qw2Ec8ihWwgqMrHUwnI6SgjDRBkbkieYgcRDihy7oowIA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=S3A7QmNGHJMON7aW1FzQLeriPr79zM+uxsycyQNPeAk=; b=Ni6wr+VkUbtiqjOFrf3xiIEUsc/kpVrreA0gBV48LyhDZYYzRZ70fvTIk0Ls4RZp9M0C1y3df2hRvyoLNuyuf3xYr+xsgDMDclN7kIHVMn3eAozIrdhVpw99/Dlr3qdajodvTKrTpwrqB1zowQn/hhQumP46cbQXFUpoiVQH8k8=
Received: from SN6PR11MB2654.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:54::31) by SN6PR11MB2976.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:d5::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.24; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:40:53 +0000
Received: from SN6PR11MB2654.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5081:b134:66a1:f047]) by SN6PR11MB2654.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5081:b134:66a1:f047%2]) with mapi id 15.20.2900.026; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:40:53 +0000
From: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation@ietf.org>
CC: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: Shepherd review comment draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-04
Thread-Index: AQHWEEF9Qn2q4b2EW0qtxDu2PgHzHQ==
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:40:52 +0000
Message-ID: <B6E3234E-1D84-4057-B7BA-96352E7AF8F9@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=mankamis@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:646:8500:d450:7849:8f5:6717:775c]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 509c57e9-43c9-4a47-5052-08d7de58a0ba
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR11MB2976:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR11MB29768EE608EA038A8149B6FADFDF0@SN6PR11MB2976.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 03706074BC
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SN6PR11MB2654.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(366004)(136003)(316002)(5660300002)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(6486002)(66446008)(2906002)(71200400001)(86362001)(66946007)(33656002)(6512007)(6916009)(6506007)(76116006)(91956017)(81156014)(8936002)(8676002)(478600001)(2616005)(54906003)(36756003)(186003)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: nNM1shN76wimgtt7AacWg87SY3CgTiDfMrNgowyGIp0M9fPjZYBecHv4vfYn3DAdnB4IstMKTnHd2JmsJ13M9J11EB+uNRlZxDgq7snTA/HtyoySM+wwRPcQ/MyIxpx5FkIRU1C5OC2OVqE6+lDr4jcVhHwokCekEQo5oodpuapm+bvjhXN+nPNkpnLivJFwwI90PbjTN/VSpL3B3KrIupvihSGY6WgQ1v533DMsklguzvqtLZwHbQYoL9kJo2KfefexfcgwckniLMj+gbZfgj6sFnEgSUFPPq7+2qZHVZ8cNLIE+r28WF5W+0DTRVnINsH9eOs7qaM0NlgGkhvXBAKnuLVx2tuTslX9REZlyH40wOXMqSRvVhq5tt/6sHC/vlylJSomXNLzKdFEQ6UdWnk8GLbUowLd29wh00Ojqmq2hVsM8i9OQGNLUvlGMtXp
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: SV1aYCkGkpB9BauJj05zU1G9ctPunLNHrRaGGKIfnsNHazp40i+bCyUe7PQmJDLQMymV8qiSjBnm/bG7/PztvjtPAW1NkehXrPladZbkn/QXJhfRNBq4LtIuTkzzGywK2DT0TGP5UMXq/Ve+V0WTWGdADcUrL7wtRaaIUPfSR7/g4sB6FdDVaTmsgy5y6FhPdjZRsCrkbX6nypHqbsK0iA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B6E3234E1D844057B7BA96352E7AF8F9ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 509c57e9-43c9-4a47-5052-08d7de58a0ba
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Apr 2020 20:40:52.9298 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Bn3/7S9kMLxfYLPEjDi4ITc7Y7VH5jOPdn4GeI1wJIvxsM5wX9lnYsFptob711PY44kL/Vwq+nfdHmbdu6Xdpw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR11MB2976
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/D5cTg1nK-h7A5rZSY6N0WH4hJ3s>
Subject: [bess] Shepherd review comment draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-04
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:40:58 -0000

Authors,
As part of BESS Shepherd review process, went over document. Its in good shape to move forward. But I have some comments .


  *   Abstract : I think new directive is not to have any RFC reference in Abstract, so you can remove reference of RFC 6514 from abstract
  *   Terminology : Since it uses many terms from RFC 7761 (PIM), 6513 and 5614 . it may be good to state that familiarity with terms used in these RFC would be useful.
  *   Introduction :
     *   In introduction I see it talks about PE1 , PE2. But there Is no picture / topology in document . it may be useful to have one sample topology created .
     *   Introduction does mention one statement about Extranet, but rest of the document does not have any mention of it. Do you want to add small paragraph which talks about what is expected in case of extranet ?
  *   Section 3:  Statement from this section “In that case, if the selected best MVPN SA route does not have the "MVPN SA RP-address EC" but another route for the same (C-S, C-G) does, then the best route with the EC SHOULD be chosen.” Does it not make sense to make it as MUST ?


Mankamana

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email