[bess] SRv6 / (SR)MPLS co-existence for bess
Eduard Metz <etmetz@gmail.com> Mon, 17 May 2021 08:16 UTC
Return-Path: <etmetz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCF43A2E06 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 May 2021 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6DhD9BxEed0A for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 May 2021 01:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CF93A2E03 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 May 2021 01:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id z13so7514728lft.1 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 May 2021 01:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WQPpcbXak/J4Wm962A3q5FF4x++PCjF/JA+lqzkxmkg=; b=KAzoy7FqJn5X0M7RDnL/DEgcWVxkfBVEhilxCUPyVmJP0k5O13xhb9dpv6Y3Fmbohc kKqkNpvfPxM9GwGJOJ8PVALudkqWoqQxDEFpTs691ZdlOFy7ecwwZGN/G7TUCSCnsYMS hW9lvN6tk6rsdLGITy/dVfY8MCVBr36KxxSe6xAIKEsF02ymKFOwOnQ/l0LNDq6uierT 9kOFf7t/FRmjmqBF7xHwVpvk83cBpAWQ1AhxhgMnLh2iOuVWd+gLTt+1WCuVpE6Sq7YP Ru2mWGKnktqEL57wnSecsUf9YK2Xx7FDX7CZFx0dlwpEK2NA53wWCeNFdI+SWAE5o/BO nHtg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WQPpcbXak/J4Wm962A3q5FF4x++PCjF/JA+lqzkxmkg=; b=LYHj0I2t+G3qXhQhYFtFZkKWtGh52RQDFsgIb2UQNStjm5B8VCkKrKZ2ufyjY1u6cS 1fBBR5mptLQH1fNohqHFC0q26HculdFA41BRcqo6WoykjxcbK0DQmJ35xJyxznP7AXV4 yy3diyG54zaKT2CSbE/BeV7I32gFvurvQPtIxDglFZ2Z+4brgjgyaOfzBzcsnVjvtdyx JFYoxdAE+P3k+NwWA8fcXImB8pr3VbbI9CN+677PcQe/PjVKoHhZ9fyM4Q5AmUSGnDA9 20BV6h9EwVNMuTWT8FwM62dECbufr+YRzdTzmbATPuQO8d+Lu3/aI8YQBTF4GaJP/7se WZ4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ujgQoDGkmYCbuYdUUxaP1Fw6cY28i56UNjKOn8g8J1KKIe+xE pgotdXgLb/npTNnUKT0st+k3hNG9NpAW358LrSrkdEoRuho=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMDGJ2Kch910s4Pe23xAvTYa8HtBPp8V8uaPZLGyA9jG944QIEw9wXveOUF2PBnfKwTqEboaO7iMRqbVeKvTI=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:e008:: with SMTP id x8mr2681027lfg.439.1621239371054; Mon, 17 May 2021 01:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Eduard Metz <etmetz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 10:16:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG=3OHdWpB1HgQff1AKZQE5as7QoF2wd7-5nw7F4kNRVkdD+vA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bess@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cec2c305c2823471"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/F40UEm1G8JlHs-70rRFEalFVXSk>
Subject: [bess] SRv6 / (SR)MPLS co-existence for bess
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 08:16:18 -0000
Hello, Co-existence of multiple dataplane technologies to carry BESS services is useful for among others migration of one dataplane technology to another (e.g. (SR)MPLS to SRv6). Can co-existence be achieved without changing current specifications, or would it require extensions / changes? For example as proposed in draft-ls-bess-srv6-mpls-coexisting-vpn. I was thinking maybe the BGP ADD-PATH capability could be leveraged to achieve co-existence. Would it be of interest to document co-existence cases and solutions? Thanks! cheers, Eduard
- [bess] SRv6 / (SR)MPLS co-existence for bess Eduard Metz
- Re: [bess] SRv6 / (SR)MPLS co-existence for bess Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [bess] SRv6 / (SR)MPLS co-existence for bess Eduard Metz