IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-11: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Wed, 17 March 2021 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC1C3A0CDB; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rY7p37pW-o7b; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D0A3A0DFB; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 12HEBNWK002347; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:11:23 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu 12HEBNWK002347
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1615990283; bh=wM9YoIsdszf4DQhNO6302KW2l2wbnGUTsc/dhXtTqhQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EPO7jjIDxdK+Ue8wxh1BgrMh4hpvb2QFTEu+KkGPmqXaRJjRClUjIz4HJBUpQqr0n i47RudVduwSeohB9J4c7W8zPf5kQ2aI32N+53z1ACm53VVFgVFula99UhWNEOBz1N3 YkHeQFF/8d7WTHtzu7vvcH+PGRXacjadTTgZb/MY=
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (morris.ad.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.46]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 12HEBJOO017281; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:11:19 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:11:18 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:11:18 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd@ietf.org>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHW75oaq+nACgxE60m7PSArtsAxtKqInqsA///JxKA=
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:11:18 +0000
Message-ID: <a104dccf0ee34f3b8facf5f5bc149e24@cert.org>
References: <161119480258.25314.13522682222976751997@ietfa.amsl.com> <MWHPR08MB352033B3EE4C5E5231B7B06CF76A9@MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR08MB352033B3EE4C5E5231B7B06CF76A9@MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.202.98]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a104dccf0ee34f3b8facf5f5bc149e24certorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/FkJohdVqx4iRwa_73rdwG4C08nA>
Subject: Re: [bess] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:11:37 -0000

Hi Jorge!

Thanks much for the update.

Roman

From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 7:05 AM
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd@ietf.org; bess-chairs@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-11: (with COMMENT)

Hi Roman,

Thank you for reviewing, please see my comments with [jorge]. Will publish the new version after addressing the rest of the reviews too.

Thx
Jorge

From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org<mailto:noreply@ietf.org>>
Date: Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 3:06 AM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd@ietf.org> <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd@ietf.org>>, bess-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org> <bess-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org>>, bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com<mailto:matthew.bocci@nokia.com>>, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com<mailto:matthew.bocci@nokia.com>>
Subject: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-11: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Russ Housley for the SECDIR review.
[jorge] yes, thank you Russ.


A few editorial nits:
** Abstract.  Please remove the reference [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags] from
the abstract as this section of the document is not permitted to have
references.
[jorge] sounds good. It was originally added to clarify as requested by the ADs, but I guess we can remove it now. I left it as follows:
This document describes the Ethernet Virtual Private Networks (EVPN)
   Proxy-ARP/ND function, augmented by the capability of the ARP/ND
   Extended Community.  From that perspective this document updates the
   EVPN specification to provide more comprehensive documentation of the
   operation of the Proxy-ARP/ND function.  The EVPN Proxy-ARP/ND
   function and the ARP/ND Extended Community help operators of Internet
   Exchange Points, Data Centers, and other networks deal with IPv4 and
   IPv6 address resolution issues associated with large Broadcast
   Domains by reducing and even suppressing the flooding produced by
   address resolution in the EVPN network.



** Section 3.1.b.  s/They SHOULD be learned out of/They SHOULD be learned from/
[jorge] fixed


** Section 5.5.  s/almost all IXPs installed/almost all IXPs install/
[jorge] fixed, thanks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email