[bess] Lack of implementation for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction - submit to IESG?

Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> Tue, 11 October 2016 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A0012941C for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WS2cuRtmwyg0 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A00129605 for <bess@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 0EFE2F96A1F8C for <bess@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:00:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u9BF0vYN023940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <bess@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:00:58 GMT
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u9BF0v9I031582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <bess@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:00:57 +0200
Received: from [135.224.203.10] (135.239.27.38) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:00:57 +0200
Message-ID: <57FCFEA8.3070400@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:00:56 +0200
From: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.38]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/I1D2bM2a4-8x5N6g7Y3RrS5mOE4>
Subject: [bess] Lack of implementation for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction - submit to IESG?
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:01:04 -0000

WG,

we have recently LCed draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction and 
there was sufficient support to move forward. However we haven't 
received any input on existing implementations.

As per [1] we are thus asking the WG whether we should nevertheless move 
this to IESG or wait until implementations exist.

Please respond. Thank you.


M&T

[1]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw