[bess] Mail regarding draft-rbickhart-evpn-ip-mac-proxy-adv
"UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com> Wed, 27 March 2019 11:20 UTC
Return-Path: <ju1738@att.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C041120254; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 04:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.85, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oh0vVDsEFvub; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 04:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 246D8120296; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 04:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049458.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2RBFY8E016524; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:20:50 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2rg73rs7h1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:20:50 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2RBKncd008732; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:20:49 -0400
Received: from zlp27129.vci.att.com (zlp27129.vci.att.com [135.66.87.42]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2RBKiim008638; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:20:45 -0400
Received: from zlp27129.vci.att.com (zlp27129.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp27129.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id D86394039284; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:20:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAA.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [130.9.129.145]) by zlp27129.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id C59B44039283; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:20:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.4.152]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAA.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.145]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:20:43 -0400
From: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>
To: "draft-rbickhart-evpn-ip-mac-proxy-adv@ietf.org" <draft-rbickhart-evpn-ip-mac-proxy-adv@ietf.org>
CC: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mail regarding draft-rbickhart-evpn-ip-mac-proxy-adv
Thread-Index: AdTkjX1zvAo7u2trT36yWUr584C0JQ==
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:20:44 +0000
Message-ID: <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F4D833AEC@MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.76.88.210]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F4D833AECMISOUT7MSGUSRCD_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-27_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=362 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903270080
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/NNtixJAynu9FSxxLwX2MTj2qmis>
Subject: [bess] Mail regarding draft-rbickhart-evpn-ip-mac-proxy-adv
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:20:52 -0000
Wen,
A few comments.
I think I understand the why of this draft. One could take the view that a MAC/IP learned via a single PE on an ESI has actually gone away and will not be re-learned via other PEs on said ESI.. In that case incorrectness is being injected into the VPN state machine for said customer for as long as it takes the timer to expire. Is that right??
Generally speaking state learned via the control plane is never allowed to be re-advertised so PE1->PE2->PEX is disallowed. I am assuming that split horizon will be disabled for a MAC/IP learned from PE1 advertised to PE2, subsequently advertised to PE3 ( Actually everywhere ) as the ESI is in common.
You could also use BGP Persistence on PE3.. PE3 would enable persistence on MAC/IP:NH=PE1, ESI10 if ESI10 is also available at PE2.. In this manner PE3 would continue sending traffic to MAC/IP via PE2 as long as the ESI is valid and the timer on PE3 did not expire.
Thanks,
Jim Uttaro