[bess] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 26 February 2024 03:07 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, matthew.bocci@nokia.com, matthew.bocci@nokia.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <170891683183.41045.3027853208294970793@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 19:07:11 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/OAm4ECl-9YSXQ0Cc240-YzJTBZQ>
Subject: [bess] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Comments

### S1

* Not entirely sure, but consider whether MEF 70.2 is better (or up-to-date)
  reference. (If you do change this reference, the Table 7 & 8 mentions need
  to be revised to Table 8 & 9, if I'm not mistaken).

* I cannot seem to find mention of the IPv6 Flow Label in MEF 70.1, nor in
  MEF 70.2.  I agree that it seems like it should be supported, but these
  tables seem to list requirements for support, and flow label seems to be
  absent.

### S6.3.2

* Is it necessary for IKE to be open if the requisite IPsec tunnel parameters
  can be shared via a BGP UPDATE message instead (vis. S4.3)?

## Nits

### S3.3

* The C3<->D2 connector reads "without encrypt over Untrusted".  Should that
  be "without encryption"?

### S6.1.1

* "six one-directional" ->
  "six unidirectional"?

### S6.2.1

* "wAN ports" -> "WAN ports"

### S6.3.2

* "target Pes" -> "target PEs"?

[bess] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-be… Erik Kline via Datatracker