Re: [bess] Question on ARP probe in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding

Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com> Fri, 03 May 2019 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B941200F7 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2019 22:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7qRskySr2L7 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2019 22:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E699A120059 for <bess@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2019 22:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t1so4209375lje.10 for <bess@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 May 2019 22:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kRWfEJglJ+EU0dki89BokTllGyWxSZKirm4l8EvJllM=; b=SogoNEQK+ZlFPeSFMcRWUdVcEkGLTztzA+Mq5UzIY2HD1sXXn503rzW1TOQTTflaun rz4rCQxRw0SD52bfou/9Si+jXvaYs0+lo53A9mOWA7hXXWzhUkhNOBpPGBnw99e67p1l 2cQxR8882ERa+vwpF5iM7FyqWVIs7bKBvKnez0EZGahPrRKF8mIteuNBY/a+LO/RBWSu u8ANr17PNMUoqkZbgRWYokKiAGMQaEk4qWk8GsbTQ9a8xMUvt+Ac/2qELBWQ8MOF0As0 PSPdOiKYpM69ZSZzLCCVUfxUgvef9YWD+cJKVjQDXLR3KzGdj28OPgkm3UnOuaN/lwD+ Kgbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kRWfEJglJ+EU0dki89BokTllGyWxSZKirm4l8EvJllM=; b=PLc7eY3SsS+pGdF0cHjOiwJlYwv99OIz7KkCmggemnvPxK9Vg6KfPee4ZxalaFcbbP oP0D7i/8LvcOTQL1sFYUwm9kSmMu/dewPu05A1DUaJj5qcl053elHHcWLvi3ZVZcXjyY QqSNvY8zGbT0R3SwqZxmbZPjztZDuv5q3FahR821GRLUcVj88rqBGDKepDulSzBGIyJC bGhtrJSzopDDDgzpg96txWpJWtHRk0038f3R7AP3WWRGgFFe4dOwWIeFMfnsHUlLjUuY CrwTXc51F7mceGV9ZSLE3OwwikLsbXu4Kg1uJmXHSZJcrUYRGiWtj9OIbGmUxiOQsWXs tIFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVC+4//MeYSKocQ/wzfZVdDGdBmlkCTIbus7R2LImXnISp7rAbQ /Yd4qGbEKN+odqpPVcwz3SpMJwDyiL9XGGp8YhE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz/OREXmDJFqiXX2yVkXCaKrB5BQ5uxmATnnkdXY/odEqAWbu4y5n7Gdg1xrYJ2Gls0g8S5w3WRzOeq8YI5B0M=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9855:: with SMTP id e21mr4105099ljj.180.1556861948933; Thu, 02 May 2019 22:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKz0y8z+3UoHg_2ssWcEh50qfuAZLbrN8LkLOd5wVJ9o+uq=kQ@mail.gmail.com> <D3B5CFF7-632F-4D03-A324-80E01C37252B@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3B5CFF7-632F-4D03-A324-80E01C37252B@nokia.com>
From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 11:08:57 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKz0y8zLbKDe0ad+2AfX8+a=GU9Cm8XcOwfyJD3UnAazJmcF7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e3dd70587f52bce"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/TzWa4IEp7hZQysMic_bHgmrd6uQ>
Subject: Re: [bess] Question on ARP probe in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 05:39:14 -0000

Hi Jorge,

Thanks for your response. Please see inline..

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:43 PM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <
jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> wrote:

> Muthu,
>
>
>
> The source NVE identifies the MAC-VRF/BD out of the RT/eth-tag. The
> assumption is that the BD is only attached to one IP-VRF, hence you know
> what ARP table to look up.
>

If this is the case, why include the RT for the IP-VRF at all in route
type-2 advertisements?

Regards,
Muthu

>
>
> My two cents.
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *From: *BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Muthu Arul Mozhi
> Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, April 30, 2019 at 4:39 AM
> *To: *"bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[bess] Question on ARP probe in
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding describes the mobility
> procedure to be followed when a TS moves from a source NVE to a target NVE
> and starts sending data traffic without first initiating an ARP request. It
> says the following in section 4.2:
>
>
>
> <snip>
>
>    - The source NVE upon receiving this MAC/IP advertisement, realizes
>
>    that the MAC has moved to the new NVE. It updates its MAC-VRF table
>
>    accordingly by updating the adjacency information for that MAC
>
>    address to point to the target NVE and withdraws its EVPN MAC/IP
>
>    route that has only the MAC address (if it has advertised such route
>
>    previously). Furthermore, *it searches its ARP table for this MAC and*
>
>    *sends an ARP probe for this <MAC,IP> pair*. The ARP request message is
>
>    sent both locally to all attached TSes in that subnet as well as it
>
>    is sent to other NVEs participating in that subnet including the
>
>    target NVE.
>
> </snip>
>
>
>
> The question I have is, the MAC/IP Advertisement route the source NVE
> receives from the target NVE in the above case has only the MAC address of
> the TS and the RT corresponding to the MAC-VRF. How can the source NVE
> deduce the IP-VRF to search the corresponding ARP table and send an ARP
> probe?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Muthu
>