Re: [bess] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-10: (with COMMENT)
"Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> Fri, 18 May 2018 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3EF12DA25; Fri, 18 May 2018 12:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R_MnXFabItLQ; Fri, 18 May 2018 12:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9366012DA1D; Fri, 18 May 2018 12:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BE6R9nDa7g177Y6N6OqWO8Ct7YND2Tqk7m5BgHtu/u8=; b=FS7BTeTwnh1Vp3bGfeFNOgKgCBqNhL5IziYhF6D9OV71x5pKHEOpqVn1sEqTytFOruaFijks3sxFk3o7vs/y3M5Gjzx37mljkthUG7UtcKclHLetjvjMtUOP2QSmSqXrwwhXma1yhWkHPHAFdlXp2d02kXNYNz9MW1U/UxuqV0E=
Received: from AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.134.82.20) by AM0PR07MB3924.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.134.82.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.797.5; Fri, 18 May 2018 19:30:11 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::94aa:e7c1:4d51:f39c]) by AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::94aa:e7c1:4d51:f39c%2]) with mapi id 15.20.0797.005; Fri, 18 May 2018 19:30:11 +0000
From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
To: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement@ietf.org>, Zhaohui Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-10: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHT5p3EQDfkEVsgrkayZ0WIVHCg4KQ2ECSA
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 19:25:06 +0000
Message-ID: <7FBCFD14-D188-4F92-B1B2-D22FB4AF4863@nokia.com>
References: <152576433706.20245.13772824460627623747.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152576433706.20245.13772824460627623747.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.d.0.180513
x-originating-ip: [135.245.20.28]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM0PR07MB3924; 7:79dcLPeGKDzhY68dcj8+AaQcIbMyOmE1XkRa8FtYJPAsGA8YA1BW75K3yKDMZhNtbwTGbRwY6QJMR5dpfJJ4TWQx0/Y6iZ0xCYF521iFxVo+hiLkq3wt+76ksmt7JdvU4W8UoaoJ1CPHLHR7mZroYom7nsbVI/02bE7sv9DNdO8YFkp0U0f9q2ux6+EoQ3AX9UqOiDdkCQPXOHF9HaVBetlvhuV6kGHrluYqo6PZ/bM4n+O5E9bMxlBXO49BmqDl
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:(109105607167333); BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(8989080)(5600026)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990040)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM0PR07MB3924;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB3924:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jorge.rabadan@nokia.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB3924330233029428F8205E3BF7900@AM0PR07MB3924.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(138986009662008)(82608151540597)(85827821059158)(109105607167333)(788757137089)(95692535739014);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231254)(11241501184)(806099)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:AM0PR07MB3924; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM0PR07MB3924;
x-forefront-prvs: 0676F530A9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(39380400002)(189003)(199004)(18374002)(13464003)(26005)(3280700002)(3660700001)(82746002)(186003)(68736007)(86362001)(66066001)(36756003)(446003)(6486002)(229853002)(97736004)(76176011)(478600001)(6506007)(53546011)(102836004)(3846002)(2906002)(6116002)(25786009)(6246003)(14454004)(4326008)(83716003)(54906003)(110136005)(58126008)(316002)(99286004)(966005)(106356001)(39060400002)(5250100002)(105586002)(6436002)(305945005)(33656002)(8676002)(81156014)(81166006)(8666007)(8936002)(6512007)(7736002)(53936002)(6306002)(11346002)(486006)(5660300001)(6666003)(476003)(2616005)(2900100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB3924; H:AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 537YojerJHu0noKnc23fGfFj25wi1LfAaaROwg+RVMkNMgRHqk3JdjvFQmh1E4/7LcO9VCaHJlNzeqYzmenCw944yGlTHDGjkzEzPJz73wKv1CaLHEhcsxo50LLOpZDjCkkuQSKP/BBTlg76oxp2M5O4PFc9IR1YRb6r9lkKwukyYxuWNfumYYp+RSTGOevSDHVBSLBI9EN+vb6/Kwwwvbh8nVteGRV75XTecjYBEFeoFtThU98w2tjvFs/gPshd
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7A42C98FD05BE642B9954347415D1636@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: f3083106-8943-4bbf-7d27-08d5bcf5c5fc
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f3083106-8943-4bbf-7d27-08d5bcf5c5fc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 May 2018 19:30:11.6070 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB3924
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/YmFJFdLRgOqBUsQRgH52lN3Mq0c>
Subject: Re: [bess] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 19:30:18 -0000
Hi Ignas, Thank you very much for your review. We addressed all your comments. Please see below. Thanks, Jorge -----Original Message----- From: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 9:25 AM To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement@ietf.org>, Zhaohui Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "zzhang@juniper.net" <zzhang@juniper.net>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-10: (with COMMENT) Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org> Resent-To: <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>, <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>, <jdrake@juniper.net>, <wlin@juniper.net>, <sajassi@cisco.com> Resent-Date: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 9:25 AM Ignas Bagdonas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NVGRE and VXLAN-GPE references throughout the document – would be better to replace with Geneve, as NVGRE is historic, and GPE will wait until Geneve progresses. This does not change the logic of operation for non-Ethernet NVO tunnels. [JORGE] ok, done. s2.1, last bullet: TS4 connectivity is not required to be physical, it is just connectivity. [JORGE] I removed "physical" s3.2: s/fail to install/MUST not install [JORGE] added MUST NOT s4.3, steps 1 and 2: what if MAC address is both signaled and learned by policy? How would such conflict be resolved? Which one would take precedence? [JORGE] added: ", however the MAC in the Extended Community is preferred if sent with the route." s2: s/program/propagate [JORGE] ok, done. A few assorted nits: Document would benefit from reduction of hyphenation of common terms and normalizing the spelling of the terms throughout the document (as an example, there are forms of route type, route-type, and Route Type intermixed). Re-advertise, stripped-off, mass-withdrawal, ip-lookup, mac-lookup, re-used, inter-subnet-forwarding, next-hop. [JORGE] ok, I removed some s/route-target/Route Target [JORGE] ok, done. s/layer-2/layer 2 [JORGE] ok, done. s/layer-3/layer 3 [JORGE] ok, done. RT-2, RT-5: please consider unifying the terminology and use route type 2/route type 5, RFC7432 does not use RT-x notation. [JORGE] since they are defined in the terminology section, I think it should be fine? I left them S4.4.2: s/IP10/IP1 [JORGE] I think IP10 is correct
- [bess] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf… Ignas Bagdonas
- Re: [bess] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)