Re: [bess] [BESS] Discussions about DF-election FSM.
"Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> Sat, 13 April 2019 21:58 UTC
Return-Path: <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6868D12009A for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 14:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVlrV973G2tT for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr50104.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.5.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4CB120072 for <bess@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 14:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1LcYMuzsOqfv4zNoCcFJxZh6uIZ148hYU+1K7v7LToE=; b=tMFphOst0f6FxoqMlql1DVDuFKwR0WFaqAp9DY4tNFMK3bWLPNOsLDiY+M20qVVZmj+vNBkl5NsswQiJV7ae4ooCxRgsZAMdATTU7I93/4iKy9UngSl80B29afftcxsRqdxHUmnlAE2tnEg/ivJ77flOdW/iI+oIS/uA1y7vGM4=
Received: from AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.134.82.20) by AM0PR07MB4420.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.133.52.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1813.9; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:58:30 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::886f:c9f8:650e:1dd6]) by AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::886f:c9f8:650e:1dd6%6]) with mapi id 15.20.1792.009; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:58:30 +0000
From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
To: "wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn" <wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn>
CC: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "sajassi@cisco.com" <sajassi@cisco.com>, "jdrake@juniper.net" <jdrake@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [BESS] Discussions about DF-election FSM.
Thread-Index: AQHU8RDXgPFtyBThbkm/VaAX/3Q37qY6x3OA
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:58:30 +0000
Message-ID: <D0562457-CDF2-498C-947B-08F1B60D6C34@nokia.com>
References: <201904121719158147013@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <201904121719158147013@zte.com.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.18.0.190403
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jorge.rabadan@nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [170.250.22.19]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7ea10ab3-1ba3-48c2-7f58-08d6c05b2a97
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM0PR07MB4420;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB4420:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB4420A77EA8470239FA0A166FF7290@AM0PR07MB4420.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 00064751B6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(2351001)(8676002)(6306002)(54896002)(86362001)(53936002)(66066001)(3846002)(53546011)(6116002)(68736007)(76176011)(7736002)(256004)(14444005)(26005)(102836004)(5640700003)(6506007)(6246003)(5024004)(6512007)(229853002)(478600001)(186003)(2616005)(11346002)(97736004)(486006)(6486002)(476003)(99286004)(71190400001)(14454004)(71200400001)(83716004)(2501003)(4326008)(8936002)(36756003)(58126008)(2906002)(33656002)(82746002)(81156014)(25786009)(5660300002)(6436002)(316002)(106356001)(446003)(81166006)(54906003)(6916009)(105586002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB4420; H:AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: hPu7JCNJj5xS0szJQ0wsO2uxUdqwsxJH2W+Jh1R9E8GMfwyus/UZgfR7JeZkBSBZpOmRS0My8a6w98tb3oRD+2a2w94NZZgy9jg3rZI1X706wrq9BXC2xv7j05q12219ePlFE4Hr2y55P1NiLMTOm2jRwVsxUorREvTi4CYJIOFeraTh+cXeQypDvLixwwTbhL0/GDCERyV/8dPrSuQF7fFn5xwKsetotpJNADrjE3Qen1jKFqsD84xgTgFJc4v26ky6HrLkWVmvs6gNJGgJhq8IjBnUk4WnTefc6uH0fghqIXdVFywK4Js5qrcNL1ROQnllzYkaXK+hT9nnZw/4qbrJZX/vdbVfRTdHlbOTSyj+R383Y3EsmbSHssDMWScGICkoywPn/9eWgd1pHcKEk8KAhirT7vg/UQYlQlqEy2k=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0562457CDF2498C947B08F1B60D6C34nokiacom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7ea10ab3-1ba3-48c2-7f58-08d6c05b2a97
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Apr 2019 21:58:30.6993 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB4420
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/d9QLbXFPtcsMr9Ge-ixVQO39ReU>
Subject: Re: [bess] [BESS] Discussions about DF-election FSM.
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:58:37 -0000
The DF Election framework draft does not change that aspect of RFC7432. The ES route is advertised when the ES goes up, and the timer allows some time to collect the other routes for the same ES. IMHO RFC7432 is pretty clear about that... Thx Jorge From: "wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn" <wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn> Date: Friday, April 12, 2019 at 5:19 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "sajassi@cisco.com" <sajassi@cisco.com>, "jdrake@juniper.net" <jdrake@juniper.net> Subject: [BESS] Discussions about DF-election FSM. Hi Jorge, I read the draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-08 and find it seemed not clear in the DF election FSM . I didn't find clear explanation about when to advertise the ES route(RT-4) according to the FSM. I think it is the DF_TIMER (not ES_UP) event that triggers the advertising of ES route. Because if not the remote PEs will re-elect a new DF immediately after the advertisment, and the new DF may be the PE in DF_WAIT state itself. but I didn't find clear explanation in the relevant event transmissions. The description in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-08 section 3.1 as follows: 2. INIT on ES_UP: transition to DF_WAIT. ... ... 6. DF_WAIT on DF_TIMER: transition to DF_CALC. 7. DF_CALC on entering or re-entering the state: (i) rebuild candidate list, hash and perform election (ii) Afterwards FSM generates CALCULATED event against itself. And I find in RFC7432 Section 8.5 that the advertising of ES route is not influenced by the DF_TIMER. 1. When a PE discovers the ESI of the attached Ethernet segment, it advertises an Ethernet Segment route with the associated ES-Import extended community attribute. 2. The PE then starts a timer (default value = 3 seconds) to allow the reception of Ethernet Segment routes from other PE nodes connected to the same Ethernet segment. This timer value should be the same across all PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment. So I think there is an update of RFC7432 and it needs to be clear described in the draft. or the DF timer in RFC7432 is not the same with the DF timer in that draft? Is my understanding right? Best Regards Bob
- [bess] [BESS] Discussions about DF-election FSM. wang.yubao2
- Re: [bess] [BESS] Discussions about DF-election F… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [bess] [BESS] Discussions about DF-election F… wang.yubao2