IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 21 October 2021 06:18 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7CF3A0CDB; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 23:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hJ9kqxTM4BQP; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 23:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7791D3A0CD8; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 23:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 19L6Hm65027075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 02:17:54 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 23:17:48 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Zheng Zhang <zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com>, bess-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20211021061748.GN88762@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <163479660437.30671.9142215819393268008@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <163479660437.30671.9142215819393268008@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/f6sI7y71C0_1VrTCRt96xkK-HYg>
Subject: Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:18:09 -0000

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:10:05PM -0700, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This should be an easy thing to resolve, but I'm confused about the IANA
> Considerations section.  First, it should name the registry it's updating.  For
> instance:
> 
> OLD:
> 
>   IANA has temporarily assigned the following new EVPN route types:
> 
> NEW:
> 
>   IANA has temporarily made the following entries into the EVPN Route Types
>   registry:
> 
> However, the second part of this section makes an entry in the "EVPN Multicast
> Flags Extended Community" which I can't find on IANA's site or via a search
> engine.  If you're referring to the EVPN Extended Community Sub-Types
> sub-registry of the BGP Extended Communities registry, this document should say
> that.  Or did you mean something else?

I'm pretty sure it's the registry to be created by
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy (also on this week's telechat), though
the specification there doesn't really provide a clear title for the new
registry itself.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email