Re: [bess] Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-03

"Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <> Wed, 03 July 2019 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071ED1203D5; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gsTkoJaWTg3T; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 443D61200D5; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dW571bsJ2bGekmkCmqhB/ShTBCiF/zt0cgiDZdVgrJ8=; b=hxXzTSHMp7wyYlj1z8BD8DG7GguRKksUIrsM2tzSJv31pll/bBvO5Ghk3RbTvPD4LEkhiFJo9yq5+xh5cuJv2iEPPA6XYSdGeQ34BLF9e7pR2PCU7naJsdZBQ0TQQEjLZIGj1V81/wVX2/as1x5d32nIq0UdQl4e05Ln93wyPlE=
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2052.12; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 19:54:31 +0000
Received: from ([fe80::2ce0:636d:59e3:5654]) by ([fe80::2ce0:636d:59e3:5654%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2052.010; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 19:54:31 +0000
From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <>
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <>, "" <>
CC: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [bess] Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-03
Thread-Index: AQHVMBxLDS3uVm296ECmQOpi0Q6326a5c5CA
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 19:54:31 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1a.0.190609
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is );
x-originating-ip: []
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3530e2ad-5850-4a73-9eee-08d6fff04412
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM0PR07MB4273;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB4273:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 00872B689F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(316002)(6246003)(99286004)(81166006)(6436002)(66066001)(2906002)(3846002)(33656002)(2501003)(58126008)(478600001)(76176011)(36756003)(102836004)(6306002)(450100002)(6512007)(110136005)(4326008)(26005)(53936002)(186003)(6506007)(53546011)(25786009)(8936002)(6116002)(68736007)(81156014)(71190400001)(256004)(966005)(6486002)(71200400001)(476003)(2616005)(305945005)(14454004)(64756008)(66476007)(14444005)(66556008)(229853002)(66446008)(486006)(66946007)(91956017)(76116006)(73956011)(7736002)(5660300002)(86362001)(446003)(11346002)(8676002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB4273;; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None ( does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Anq1/SnsZnDahlWKIsnwQ3H3TpamRZeyVB5jqADuxjL5TeUIra7izS27s4/zaqIZdg/T+ZQxZgKPweMXKCHxk9wKxivlf/nEqGMMxQU9IdjbeKgdP+l3qpPkQen40nwlviMDbd6Em3w9lXUDUHaiDI3y/TFJ5XhohxZPDHtrQu1iiQqL8U3niPX0lIqQOtgNp/KA9oSO9D3C/BcQ3ZZHGmYEYokiJOawNmho1tUDBr/brlJLhKcudDrsrn4ueaQciyRl0n4OD+4cZsEDF3iXS/WPKOwvEcoLB9h/1UcrnEUrrLtvRyptCAaJdp9RBqI4OHvaq4pg1Ic5P3/3YRjK52tOusVdX0a03nuw9SCeRypnEisGrLTMC75AburFXmCwS2SyixsNwKxtQkdsebdJS9yVo4lp8obwrtBoXx4yKOo=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3530e2ad-5850-4a73-9eee-08d6fff04412
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Jul 2019 19:54:31.7169 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB4273
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bess] Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 19:54:38 -0000


We just published rev 04 that should address all your comments.
Thank you for reviewing!


-----Original Message-----
From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <>
Date: Monday, July 1, 2019 at 4:50 PM
To: "" <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [bess] Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-03
Resent-From: <>
Resent-To: <>, <>, <>, <>
Resent-Date: Monday, July 1, 2019 at 4:50 PM

    Authors, WG,
    One further comment on this draft.
    In the IANA considerations section you request the creation of a new registry for the "ARP/ND Extended Community Flags octet". The registry has a number of unassigned Flags. However, the draft does not specify a registration policy for this registry.
    Please can you propose a suitable registration policy. See section 4 of RFC 8126 for information on the different policies. 
    On 26/06/2019, 17:46, "BESS on behalf of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" < on behalf of> wrote:
        I am the document shepherd for this draft. Please see below for my comments. Please treat these as you would any other WG last call comments.
        Best regards
        Why do you say the EVPN ARP/ND Extended Community is optional? Don’t you always use it if you comply to the procedures in the draft? Also, I am not clear why in section 3 you say the PE will follow the procedures (which I interpret as a MUST), but there are no MUSTs in e.g. 3a.
        Please clarify in the draft.
        Please also check the capitalization of RFC2119 keywords throughout. For example, there are a few instances where a 'may' should be a 'MAY'
        Abstract and 1. Introduction
        This document proposes an OPTIONAL extended community that is
           advertised ...
        Change to 'this document defines an extended community..."
        Section 1.1 Terminology and Conventions:
        "Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) Requests or Neighbor Discovery (ND) - or Neighbor Solicitation (NS) - messages are replied locally by the PE,"
        This text seems to mix up Neighbor Discovery (the process) with Neighbor Solicitation (the message). I would suggest deleting Neighbor Discovery from this sentence.
        1. Use of the EVPN ARP/ND Extended Community
        A PE may learn the IPv6->MAC pair and its associated ND Flags in the management plane or snooping Neighbor Advertisement messages coming from the CE.
        s/management plane or snooping Neighbor/management plane or by snooping Neighbor
        BESS mailing list