IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes

"Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com> Sun, 24 January 2016 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4781A0011 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 06:47:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zTznhkWC3Hvu for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 06:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 880B71A0010 for <bess@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 06:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr711umx2.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.39]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 77B624C83541F for <bess@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:47:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr711umx2.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u0OElNBk018054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <bess@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:47:23 GMT
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u0OElMAM032005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <bess@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:47:23 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.98]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:47:13 +0100
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regd. DF Election Notes
Thread-Index: AQHQx2lcLBTaSxjkaUGDhnTJEICEUZ3tSaEAgRcwTQCAB2N2AA==
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:47:12 +0000
Message-ID: <368A4D35-7D83-435D-A953-FF6D006C8003@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <D1D9C733.36B69%satyamoh@cisco.com> <B0FFCE83-B533-4335-AA9F-60DF7C8A0C1D@alcatel-lucent.com> <D2C41B13.48088%satyamoh@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2C41B13.48088%satyamoh@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151008
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_368A4D357D83435DA953FF6D006C8003alcatellucentcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/p2txQXTPnpRwQbXr-REILsc-9B8>
Subject: Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:47:28 -0000

Support, since this enhances the DF election for EVPN

On 1/11/16, 1:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" <bess-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:

Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02 [1] as a working group item.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in the both
cases, please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *the 25th of January*.

Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this document.

*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).

==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
each author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election/

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>>
Date: Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 10:28 PM
To: smohanty mohanty <satyamoh@cisco.com<mailto:satyamoh@cisco.com>>
Subject: Re: Regd. DF Election Notes

Here you go

From: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)"
Date: Sunday 26 July 2015 08:07
To: Wim Henderickx
Subject: Regd. DF Election Notes

Hi Wim,

Good to talk to you at the airport.
I am following up on the request to please send me the writeup regarding the various service models sec 6.1 – 6.3.
About 2-3 years back you had circulated such a dic.
Best would be if you’ve examples.

Thanks,
--Satya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email