[bess] BDF Election in EVPN VPWS Single-Active Multihoming

Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com> Fri, 22 March 2019 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9FC12426E for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6FvAYMq4Py9 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A35130EC0 for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v13so1723324ljk.4 for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9MORo9YCLzt2CPymL9szJpcV5Khy3gQLo8PjlpA33S8=; b=L2nUOLjzNdNjMIDTm3n3adXhzYHM/ZVqTDO0h07C0eHFNGX45o0fiZdlOfdMSbV0g0 DMYuj8Z6GHsjd2e/uhhdfeKBlu12+H7wmvutPbvZ0PdHHNWy+n1aGLBJjp4cV82zu2Gt rC/hWeBxUn/6iE7dNMp9HTSnBbzjAiyjjQmC1VFpWc5A0OZhQfV1zvHTdG6dbAlOFnSf 5bVlE9a52Rz0IcEUK8JR/bb1iMFqW1uFpoUmv1I3FRR9iT3c+PckTCOfXBh+6k96uDHO yb7rI8qVjBZ7cucZ+vXhrM83xPCq/62L9uHLJc9T+ZORBUC7GUfAMJKjSQvlNDPswYkL r1UQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9MORo9YCLzt2CPymL9szJpcV5Khy3gQLo8PjlpA33S8=; b=C8faZjj8XsuQmXnD73arDR+ZikhCmuFMHF1HGZCObMQXlbthvwOvYHCoOi9uSKRPUS xdWAhkuX+T5ML1xV/BwjC4ZBzBIxUlaaeCNBxAo14P/dvgyg6BeEIOYE/MhY2Ol2Bvbr z2EoW3x/bUeIZ5OvBbhWscdiy95CUSvfTK2ZmVI8R1YvBCcSPGeBfs/kNsjO96+q4Lnu wt9h4rLLFULrAp3LsYTkSlLr1boCRImNoSDEkScMgoj6ERmhG9koPmZp1KvzEqHl1Xbr 38f4AB89+xRLFH/P2+yB5DiWBHb0cJ8rVYlkxiDP1/My+vpAuvlR+o2ZSybz267axoBn oY/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWhxHn8VFCWFaxU/QqC7Heee1/SC9EFcGbLYTAnvfLpsMpHPqvn 6IspIl4TvTSSR0uJ8YGYBJP2W7J2HPR7SnNgQyCM1Xj6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxPpZGtSsxrMZc7amZp/QEhVqH6uUk38hV4Eew8OMjFh2sUNM4toOy3Uqy4FnOoxyoqtYeGx4VM165cbegyZ0U=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:904b:: with SMTP id n11mr4978308ljg.57.1553253811611; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:53:20 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKz0y8zPKgTc7ctDgthOuUyag-zM8xV-P=nAC0js9HKOKYSnJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bess@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000afeabb0584ad156a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/rGGpG0fRJqG5X6b_xHUmDvrARZU>
Subject: [bess] BDF Election in EVPN VPWS Single-Active Multihoming
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:23:35 -0000

While RFC 8214 doesn't recommend any DF election algorithm capable of
electing the BDF in EVPN VPWS single-active multihoming for deciding the
backup PE, any feedback on what is(are) the widely implemented/supported DF
election  algorithm(s) by vendors?

Regards,
Muthu