Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03.txt
Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Mon, 11 July 2022 23:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ghanwani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3603C1C4BC4 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id joN3uGWjnEMa for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-f174.google.com (mail-pg1-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D880EC1C4BC1 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id e132so6054875pgc.5 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VZ2qHFJ4xeETSYr3agUbSLfCCVB/jmgkAGKYe3EMKqA=; b=tDGB+Z07STYplrIixaFkYxYkvvC99Xz6eUL/Aek6w3XYGb4A8voz1r/TbmAh7Lbzv7 JSQ1UReJ4ncirg6YnFLrWaNXQDcsNWn63MYKiiGSTNs2dBLHQ1t4rBuGWYmwiOtHOWHO pRJtUoGOd1GjK3s/fFk4yx3+Zi14D9DqyuTgsx5Nx/uERVK617gD/r6JTBK//Lcn2ij4 64yWthsWjlG+sSxYZKmWoGKYiF2OlSvIBEHNtlGdT10bsR2reaHtH3QZUp6APjsSOYYD 1MGVHiDNqHqTAkdEREoWqwapdX5HKFGxQFksEj0YywCdaCSh6aNmynhGXZ8H/Qu60zIS QuRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8CArH448D05heahSrk03TQfTVobSZcbTX40PFv8Amj3poYjdE5 vz+OktzO+yuLN1YcnbUhz0jPuZeW7l8jtMHFXaM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vzXdnHvKeWxKv3sWitSFSIyQ67lAyw30kXwe0Y/AbbpG9tzGBsqQbc3mfKbj8KYlnfVoNVsfi7b559XLluKPk=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:440e:0:b0:412:6fd1:5f79 with SMTP id r14-20020a63440e000000b004126fd15f79mr17843700pga.301.1657582057234; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <165598274045.35053.5881787134785323884@ietfa.amsl.com> <BY3PR08MB7060A13CABA2A1B13D59D605F7B59@BY3PR08MB7060.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <007e01d88716$c9100450$5b300cf0$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <007e01d88716$c9100450$5b300cf0$@gmail.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:27:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzyHY7QxinnKRs990rvPSAXgN8UOSkRifDybpME23NtHeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b526c305e38fe532"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/rUWuAPXtdG_2msFsT8uyL6tWhfw>
Subject: Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03.txt
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:27:38 -0000
I had only editorial comments on this one, and they all appear to be fixed. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/3u6z_CaCS886H0yh4ebbILj37s4/ Thanks, Anoop On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 8:34 AM <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gyan, Anoop, > > > > As you commented during the WGLC, could you please confirm that this new > version is OK for you ? Then, we’ll move fwd. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Stephane > > > > > > *From:* BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia > - US/Sunnyvale) > *Sent:* jeudi 23 juin 2022 13:17 > *To:* bess@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [bess] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03.txt > > > > FYI > > > > This is an update of the draft that addresses the comments made during the > WGLC. Some other changes are added to improve readability. > > Please let us know if you have comments. > > > > Thank you! > > Jorge > > > > *From: *BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org > <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > *Date: *Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 1:12 PM > *To: *i-d-announce@ietf.org <i-d-announce@ietf.org> > *Cc: *bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. > > Title : EVPN Multi-Homing Extensions for Split Horizon > Filtering > Authors : Jorge Rabadan > Kiran Nagaraj > Wen Lin > Ali Sajassi > Filename : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03.txt > Pages : 18 > Date : 2022-06-23 > > Abstract: > Ethernet Virtual Private Network (EVPN) is commonly used along with > Network Virtualization Overlay (NVO) tunnels, as well as MPLS and > Segment Routing tunnels. The EVPN multi-homing procedures may be > different depending on the tunnel type used in the EVPN Broadcast > Domain. In particular, there are two multi-homing Split Horizon > procedures to avoid looped frames on the multi-homed CE: ESI Label > based and Local Bias. ESI Label based Split Horizon is used for > MPLSoX tunnels, E.g., MPLSoUDP, whereas Local Bias is used for > others, E.g., VXLAN tunnels. The existing specifications do not > allow the operator to decide which Split Horizon procedure to use for > tunnel encapsulations that could support both. Examples of tunnels > that may support both procedures are MPLSoGRE, MPLSoUDP, GENEVE or > SRv6. This document extends the EVPN Multi-Homing procedures so that > an operator can decide the Split Horizon procedure for a given tunnel > depending on their own requirements. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon/ > > There is also an htmlized version available at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org: > :internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
- [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-… internet-drafts
- Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-sp… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale)
- Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-sp… slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-sp… Anoop Ghanwani