Re: [bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 11 April 2017 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A19F12EADF; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8JKM6czY3xIe; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3119129536; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=966; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1491928984; x=1493138584; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Y/O7apEnEqnBX3XjnwwBZDVnaceTr8lERtzoXHOXUCc=; b=InC8Ur1FxunkMY9YjTu3SSBihhskga/IxPIP9y5lyehxz1m4JyXXpwJt ax+//48CXYKTiWPrSva9waT5oCZ+ziIOZ/qI6T9c/uJYDtkm5EskmQ+w0 ag0NOU2KIB3yLD0IPRx+gF2CGZBHcLM+4Lh/KYbySa5i4BDLce4hx3C0k g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AvAgB7Bu1Y/5FdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1NhgQsHg1+KE6JDhGOCDzCFdAIag0c/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYGIxFFEAIBCBoCJgICAjAVBQsCBAENBYoQDqkTgiaKfgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQuFRYIFgmuDF4E/gwYugjEBBIkljH6GXAGGf4tekUSUAAEfOIEFWxVSAYRJHBmBSnUFiEOBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,186,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="409674588"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Apr 2017 16:43:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3BGh3Km020157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:43:03 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:43:02 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:43:02 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws@ietf.org>, "Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSsuGLYB71Hx0fZEWW7PDbt90vOKHAcF2A
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:43:02 +0000
Message-ID: <1DE88F3F-615C-4B75-BB71-AA2E47530DBF@cisco.com>
References: <149192848949.15710.2371394446510583524.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149192848949.15710.2371394446510583524.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7409CC1DA8AA7B42A442FD1E3C756E63@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/sgYtaqhSC_dlQtVowTB6zZdhlS4>
Subject: Re: [bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:43:06 -0000

Hi!

Yes, the WG was made aware of the IPR at the WGLC:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/I5_GI44221EZJGQGWHVdv0ukbGk/?qid=08649c721ebdb111c215f6854ff0c241 

Alvaro.




On 4/11/17, 12:34 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The shepherd write-up says:
"Two IPR discussions from Juniper & Cisco respectively:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws
Haven't seen WG discussion on that."
Can we confirm that the wg is aware of the IPRs before publication?