IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-08: (with COMMENT)

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Mon, 16 January 2017 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C3912951E; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 22:17:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bo4WHce7BWVi; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 22:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B01129436; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 22:17:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3494; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1484547421; x=1485757021; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=IRZnb6GFccnUGB0UAOCoCfwN3vBa7KP20FeOqeCDwoc=; b=FckVvcv+2SUcekvUNAJnGmQ41HlkQgsEye8iF0zeteIjLNOWNhVvELdg b1UywKVr1fIoDYrx/AkO4oxAOFUDVMDQmN/ToojBfTY1e/8XukrzMFZQx JlAxQ3esORxM8ByGkQ80fzIk+oXfbFsSXPZ0mJ6lUg+a1xoNxSAK+b+F9 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BdAQAGZXxY/5ldJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzkBAQEBAR9fgQkHg0qKB5F1H5BRgkyCD4ILKoV4AhqCAj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYyiEaQEBAQQjEUUMBAIBBgIOAwMBAgMCJgICAjAVBQMIAgQBDQWJAw6QMZ1OgiWJfQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQuHPAiCXYQaEQEcBzECgkwtgjEFiHqSQAGGXIsCgXeFDolokmsBHzhxUxVKAYRagUdzAYY/gSEBgQwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,237,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="198977049"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2017 06:16:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0G6Gp67026235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 06:16:51 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 01:16:50 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 01:16:50 -0500
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSb1ZDrqYCBfEX2kC8RMGOydMLL6E7UZaA
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 06:16:50 +0000
Message-ID: <6C53834A-6A4B-401C-9646-9A3456599165@cisco.com>
References: <148450193905.3263.13819840691112205423.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <148450193905.3263.13819840691112205423.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [72.163.172.131]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <AF7D9562DBCA5E4FB7760D859F056A63@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/-WyGbfrlo4oMoyMCBilvxU54F3Y>
Cc: "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 06:17:03 -0000

Hi Mirja,

Thanks for your feedback. Please see inline <Ram>

-----Original Message-----
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Sunday, 15 January 2017 at 11:08 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri@ietf.org>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-08: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: <rmohanr@cisco.com>, <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Resent-Date: Sunday, 15 January 2017 at 11:08 PM

    Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-08: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    - sec 4.2. The MUST here is inappropriate (given the split of docs):
    „For example, to negotiate BFCP-over-WebSocket the "proto" value in the
       "m=" line MUST be TCP/WSS/BFCP if WebSocket is over TLS, else it
    MUST
       be TCP/WS/BFCP.“
    Should be instead:
    „For example, to negotiate BFCP-over-WebSocket the "proto" value in the
       "m=" line is TCP/WSS/BFCP if WebSocket is over TLS, else it is
       TCP/WS/BFCP., as specified in [I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket]“

<Ram> Agree. Make sense. I will fix this.

    - Also remove the following sentence in section 4.3:

    „For BFCP application, the "proto" value in the "m=" line
       MUST be TCP/WSS/BFCP if WebSocket is run on TLS, else it MUST be
       TCP/WS/BFCP.“
<Ram> ok.

    - In section 6: „a=ws/a=wss-uri“. Maybe use „a=ws-uri/a=wss-uri“ instead?

<Ram> correct it should a=ws-uri/a-wss-uri. 

I will address all the above comments.
Regards,
Ram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email