Re: [bfcpbis] Jari Arkko's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13: (with DISCUSS)

[Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>]

Jari, Suresh,

thanks for your comments. Tom is currently editing this draft. He will
get back to you with a response shortly.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 05/03/2015 2:01 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for the hard work on this protocol. I have some comments, based on
> a review by Suresh Krishnan, that I think should be addressed before
> final approval of the document.
> 
> First, Section 5.1 should be clear that when used over a reliable
> transport, not only should the F flag be ignore but that the fragment
> fields (last four bytes) are not in the packet.
> 
> Second, Section 6.2.3 should be clear that the header accompanies all
> fragments. As a result, the current formula for calculating the number of
> fragments is probably wrong. This too should be updated.
> 
> 
> 
>