[bfcpbis] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13: (with COMMENT)

["Alexey Melnikov" <[e-mail]>]

Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


In 4.2, last sentence: wouldn't that require a new WebSocket sub-protocol
identifier?

In 6.2: some formatting errors in the PDF version. Also, I think you
meant Section 3.3 (not 3.2) when talking about WSS.

In 7.2: when referencing Section 3, you are missing the RFC number. At
least section 3 of this draft is not relevant.

In 8: HTTP authentication text is rather weak.