[Bgp-autoconf] Issues not mentioned in yesterday's revision
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 13:52 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966353A09B7 for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:52:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.851
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=1.449, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aK9iz1QaxMSK for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285A23A0964 for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:52:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.69.45;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org, 'Linda Dunbar' <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, "'Majumdar, Kausik'" <Kausik.Majumdar@commscope.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 08:52:16 -0500
Message-ID: <00ab01d6f3ea$7ba92db0$72fb8910$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AC_01D6F3C0.92D41010"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Adbz6GiZVa+qMnF5Tk2wcYyYeQG14A==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210125-8, 01/25/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/61HLINyWGTjL3y_HtsGAGjJDr7k>
Subject: [Bgp-autoconf] Issues not mentioned in yesterday's revision
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:52:38 -0000
Jeff and Warren: Thank you for the first draft. Here's a list of requirements that I do not see mentioned: 1. security requirements - Is it a requirement to secure data sent in a L3 multicast BGP auto-configuration packet? Is there a requirement that people could send a secure portion of the packet if they desired? It all gets down to trust vs. complexity 2. validation of Data sent Will the bgp-autoconf check syntax of data sent? Will it validate the content of the data set? 3. Will it carry link level information? If so, what security issues will that cause. If you trust everyone, what about errors in the fabric. 4. Will it have a link to BFD? 5. What requirements are there on top of the IP Multicast - Is the IP multicast a "spray and pray" multicast without or is it "blast and echo check"? Mechanisms that I personally hoped would work: a) layer 3 multicast with "blast and echo" with ability to go through 2+ switches on way to remote end b) optional securing of the data sent on BGP auto-configuration c) Fast failure - via BFD or some "x" mechanism d) optional bootstrap from IGPs or LLDP Mechanism that I personally hoped a BGP-5 might revise its FSM. Sue
- [Bgp-autoconf] Issues not mentioned in yesterday'… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Issues not mentioned in yester… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Issues not mentioned in yester… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Issues not mentioned in yester… Majumdar, Kausik
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Issues not mentioned in yester… Linda Dunbar