IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] BOF deadline approaching

IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com> Mon, 02 February 2015 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ice@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8941A6FFA for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:01:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ziBoCEVcbQbS for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:01:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AD461A6FF0 for <bier@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:01:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6433; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422896486; x=1424106086; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=2bBUNLIoJRWxHha+lkYzqWGTUsvNRketXdJ+ezcXO7A=; b=TY1LX90aFxEBjXq8YTuRbfyYlo9LZdMxZzW2UBQFL5/eZMRz0HLNPMi/ mRSCMT5Hnqj7XjZ/5zG5vVRgt49V2dbG+6HiiKlqfUD36aadqAa3Wy/K6 8UnfWEPRZwHMHQqxmvdBjkrKYpjBY9MrZnuZsr9w4HK9GTliPtkA3nqPz 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A9CQCtrM9U/xbLJq1bg1hZsiQFAXaRPgEJhXECgWEBAQEBAX2EDQEBAwEBAQFrCwULCw4xBycfEQYTG4gKCA3WNAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEhgSJcAQHgxaBEwWNJoUxhVeBF4MDgkSIQYM9IoNvPTEBgkEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.09,507,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="336651637"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2015 17:01:23 +0000
Received: from ams-iwijnand-8817.cisco.com (ams-iwijnand-8817.cisco.com [10.60.202.88]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t12H1LcY012607 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:01:22 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_40098671-F42A-43E7-AFBB-7E60310D80E1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rdc9Nn8ouXFyUohrNUiD72sidLqtbvr9yBo+Sw7PYK1eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:01:21 +0100
Message-Id: <3FF683F3-8FA8-460A-8A03-5CA24063DE98@cisco.com>
References: <CAG4d1rfXUZNTAfmuhXzo5FN6eM5qbYNNpX95xf83r2pckx4r3g@mail.gmail.com> <CABFReBoLbMwibN1ONVdyzyi4mzfbQXKY=VgpsoQtqBcXPR2=tg@mail.gmail.com> <CABFReBosfd6v+z1OdHbLEhxOw4enXDu0zdKZyqNESv8=U7BTZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rdc9Nn8ouXFyUohrNUiD72sidLqtbvr9yBo+Sw7PYK1eA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/3IrjKU4o3CEI_h6LQBhaZ6EFDps>
Cc: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bier] BOF deadline approaching
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:01:33 -0000

Hi Alia,

> I am certainly happy to see the work progressing on schedule.  That's a good sign.  I intend to review these
> drafts this week.  I really want to have a clear discussion of the deployment costs vs benefits of the technology;
> does BIER enable new capabilities due to scale changes?  Again - I haven't read the updated problem statement yet
> so I hope this is there. 

Please also checkout the updated use-case draft, (https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kumar-bier-use-cases-01.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kumar-bier-use-cases-01.txt>), that should help you answer the above question.

Thx,

Ice.

>  
> I'm working on a draft charter now and hope to have something to review this week.
> 
> I'm certainly happy to see a draft charter.  Do be aware that it will likely be tightened up and focused on defining
> the solution.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alia
>  
> Thanks for your help,
> Greg
>  
>  
> Putting in a BoF request, assuming it is approved of course, makes sure
> that there is meeting time scheduled.
> 
> The deadlne is Feb 6.
> 
> Regards,
> Alia
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org <mailto:BIER@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email