IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Feedback on draft-hu-bier-bfd-02

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C8912958B; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:21:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KhQY3xPkC_A4; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF18124C04; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:21:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10278; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1541650861; x=1542860461; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=l0XSGB0HNTYyFJBvHcEx3yb9e22x0/0kg3LYb8IriC4=; b=MUnb4DY6N5EJSkyNhq3uzk3cYYLmGh2Vuqyd9c4tFpoqg5rou4i1YTp4 cdeeomyVEZipiX7KIF/OdKFXvIJfS1WVPb5YuwX7r6S89H/fb2/rM6Fs6 C84/+yWDzQg+CYc2+MM6kyCE9CXz70TN33TW0XA2izKePLW0Mcca7WcCM M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFAADxuONb/5NdJa1jGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDU0pZoECJwqDbogYi3yBaCWRXIVUgXoLAQGEbAIXgnIiNA0NAQMBAQIBAQJtHQuFOgEBAQEDI1YQAgEGAhEDAQIrAgICMB0IAgQOBYMhAYEdZIw3m1CBLoU8hHiLeBeBQT+BOAwTgkyFHoJkMYImAooGhGGGLYouCQKREBiQaJdCAhEUgSYdOCeBLnAVZQGCQQmDNAEIjRRBMYwzgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,478,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="197460963"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2018 04:20:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wA84Kxud014307 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Nov 2018 04:20:59 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:20:58 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:20:58 -0600
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: "draft-hu-bier-bfd@ietf.org" <draft-hu-bier-bfd@ietf.org>
CC: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Feedback on draft-hu-bier-bfd-02
Thread-Index: AQHUdxbNv+kW2bBAtEqB4REYCklGMKVFV26A
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:20:58 +0000
Message-ID: <60B446F9-EFE3-4F17-8551-954198BAB130@cisco.com>
References: <CE547BEC-C580-4CC6-8B9B-CB22EE07E948@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE547BEC-C580-4CC6-8B9B-CB22EE07E948@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.b.0.180311
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.252.96]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_60B446F9EFE34F178551954198BAB130ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/DjEQ0x9Ks13k0rh9o3RInY_YD2g>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Feedback on draft-hu-bier-bfd-02
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:21:05 -0000

And now adding the BFD alias.

From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
Date: Thursday, November 8, 2018 at 10:54 AM
To: "draft-hu-bier-bfd@ietf.org" <draft-hu-bier-bfd@ietf.org>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, "bfd@ietf.org" <bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: Feedback on draft-hu-bier-bfd-02

Hi,

I just took a quick look at the draft:

  1.  Section 1, 2nd paragraph mentions “…detect unicast failures..”, I believe this should be unidirectional?
  2.  Section 1, 3rd paragraph says that active-tail is for further study. So when a tail detects a failure, how will the head be notified? If the head does not have to be notified, what action is taken?

Regards,
Reshad.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email