IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] BIER in IPv6 --- draft-zhang-bier-bierin6-04

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Thu, 26 March 2020 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B023A0D6D; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EYGe1SKleiMo; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72D0D3A0E54; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id t11so6497590ils.1; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6Rm3KLB6aCAYH2yxnXdjX1Kc1V/Fz4TW6gWPS+6Teyo=; b=u2ny2/PaIoUxo6MOgzr/GXrVgH2/oiBE844xsBRZt53JcPiJoRRzIwAp7pXwIaJnpe 0+cbb+/huqRw5wFD/I+PCQuJSZ9jnxDdzx51lh+NhXN2LvoVOWzq12ysZL8Nkg/zHHe9 395nzFrMLaSkdKT+++CylgLRHkw+WsW4sxGJDAsD1K3onDsdKEm8LdbPY2A4yJfErjY3 isqxyRUM3qijwizXQMdnpDFEwSX5QoBUv37rEo40ThcDBsDCHx/Ma4V3vsdLluNe5FEu EWDIbaMdzkaWlByzvtUMiLZP2A/tL/ydk2wiPXSdR4WgcEYVFhPYjH9oOQg7knfcgQJt 3GKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6Rm3KLB6aCAYH2yxnXdjX1Kc1V/Fz4TW6gWPS+6Teyo=; b=SPAOhTurycsMUnHsc4VA1Ee6jhFHwgozf+7rl16qTkI/gRjyTdjXiLa1aPCGgmrtVC 4eZiR1cH/JGYTlyAFozO0XrU0gBD6H4BsSBTw0RqgYhgXbP8FzTMVIgA6W1xcoZ+EqwV zU0yQJFjv/x2KblfyMObzFCFe8ee5iapzUh6yYClObXylpIEI2/iv5U10k8hWCLIYIt2 pIwKCGDuc6i9zMDTQwxT/oHKJL8481/vENm9Fs4099Ol74L3utJNLD8yr/1DoeSJ4+xP 6ZCFoQoPs2yCxjD1ytYW/ZOnfL4AcPuiJMgAmZ1/HmnDGM3f2BWrRELkPYDVx41urvmp gDvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3TFA3nM7Qmask7eFnnIWb+RnqsEH187boxEGEhnRZBMz7Tm8Tm IrboQ/yp7r/jLg7hZwlClvQ7Qo7+z5dFvBjq4G8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsudMYhDFqkn0oyZwASlJ7eCP9IsIklLcl+R1eEPqxoAy1i+n9WN6baTtwsjnQPInpts3JhhXacJBRTdAInm9U=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:688:: with SMTP id o8mr9418624ils.156.1585249643735; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV00MFZ794q2QOiLA2p51O8m5w6oG6AUwQaCMpMa1A_r+w@mail.gmail.com> <202003261725503637966@zte.com.cn> <CA+wi2hPSPVnaSLps-2qw5kjsf5-KtiWGSu9cx6p3y1wbSckNtQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200326184414.GA30139@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200326184414.GA30139@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:05:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hMg52V+WmYEQk5kLoUsvqZ_8C4qMFjiRREKp6t4N3CM4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: "zhang.zheng" <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>, BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e55a6005a1c6b157"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/HnOU9NK60ZvZNuIpjczv1-uzioE>
Subject: Re: [Bier] BIER in IPv6 --- draft-zhang-bier-bierin6-04
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:07:38 -0000

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:44 AM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:11:16AM -0700, Tony Przygienda wrote:
> > Yes, critical point. We are _not_ "tunneling" in case of LL to LL BIERin6
> > in fact for all practical purposes (tunnel assumes fragmentation/security
> > etc which BIER architecture does NOT presume from L2 header, we do not
> > expect Ethernet to fragment or encrypt BIER).
>
> When you say "We" your hat is that of a co-author ?
>
>
yepp, co-author of the original bierin6 draft obviously ...

Asking in wider scope: while reading the rest of your email: are you
implying that BIER WG should be in the busines of, as a previous
commentator put it, inventing yet another L3-routed source-specific
multicast tunneling technology?

-- tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email