[Bier] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8401 (6418)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 02 February 2021 22:25 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F763A0786; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:25:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2cphUgZoeSh; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19693A003F; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BBEFEF40739; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:25:10 -0800 (PST)
To: ginsberg@cisco.com, ginsberg@cisco.com, prz@juniper.net, aldrin.ietf@gmail.com, zzhang@juniper.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, bier@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210202222510.BBEFEF40739@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:25:10 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/Iph82sSz5NqLMAePbzV0JnuQfdQ>
Subject: [Bier] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8401 (6418)
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:25:27 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8401, "Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Support via IS-IS". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6418 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com> Date Reported: 2021-01-31 Held by: Alvaro Retana (IESG) Section: 4.2 Original Text ------------- o When the Prefix Attributes Flags sub-TLV [RFC7794] is present, the N flag MUST be set and the R flag MUST NOT be set. Corrected Text -------------- o When the Prefix Attributes Flags sub-TLV [RFC7794] is present, the N flag MUST be set. Notes ----- Early versions of the draft did not support leaking of BIER advertisements. At that time the requirement that R-flag be clear made sense. Once leaking was allowed the prohibition against R-bit being set no longer makes sense and should be removed. -------------------------------------- RFC8401 (draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Support via IS-IS Publication Date : June 2018 Author(s) : L. Ginsberg, Ed., T. Przygienda, S. Aldrin, Z. Zhang Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Bit Indexed Explicit Replication Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Bier] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8401 … RFC Errata System