IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09

Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net> Tue, 17 October 2017 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <prz@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE7E132D22; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E8ulNy2plcZr; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02on0096.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B09134211; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=FuIIUEdQCNQdMJ75z83Dc3qZL+E+bAWf3glWshSno9c=; b=X5NaaFbnSbuzczB7pFXPvQApyeH9lX/UbTCsC5jWhJbg3QJzyy23qEfy/gdnvhkyodGkH89d41WwYZZ73D2SxyTSjkOEurZtsFbaXB8cPFBOoMtp3OPmOyIG2EXcSs83BabrFQeqiknuXrlS4iMScPbZjR+LNpIBvSqacsEKKkw=
Received: from DM2PR0501MB1438.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.224.148) by SN1PR05MB2302.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.169.125.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.5; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:03:25 +0000
Received: from DM2PR0501MB1438.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::44f9:85fe:ebae:1d90]) by DM2PR0501MB1438.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::44f9:85fe:ebae:1d90%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0077.020; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:03:24 +0000
From: Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, Eric Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
CC: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation.all@ietf.org>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09
Thread-Index: AQHTRsTTKHCsNndaT0ypQR3970hRE6Lm/yOAgAApgQCAAOEQAIAAGnoA//+LFwA=
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:03:24 +0000
Message-ID: <3B6E9C9E-D5D3-478B-AADD-0607006EC0AC@juniper.net>
References: <150818892635.438.2743077513006159051@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+wi2hObSM6cZza891i371-aJDTfg2CO+JmN7F9SZ19xM7mhEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rdknKohwB_TcVtx-EA3M9Dt95MPrrL-OTHm7V32Zz_HHg@mail.gmail.com> <35595357-9c4d-eb48-468e-90842caad4a9@juniper.net> <CAG4d1rdrOwFjMhNTmubOAaebTxGfgQa0DTdcKqZkxVDvAtJXmw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rdrOwFjMhNTmubOAaebTxGfgQa0DTdcKqZkxVDvAtJXmw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.15]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR05MB2302; 6:JbpX0jIe5xDflMCJgr62UBHPZR6csTFPcXZxjT/03PTrY7W/VDEdJtz117jcv/GBnB52ox0rJYZA+42NzwSp7BlJnatvV2Jjqm992yu5vyE21tRQ+pkclzCdD91wlpRxaqBlKjZZr9XP944RrhCw1y+MYMrDF4p+ZwSNkmcFRRAvVY4DXtI54LpsC9uiLPwqcJcebRCXRHJhgbRqMyOIeu+QGqUUecAmB0liXrbvoV5A5ksNvmqT9dVxveecZfeA8SGZCcKQi2DPbJeCYceAcvoo7YwWgwIQe3AM3dThzGcViTqzEYWo1wqpJXqekySUmJNtUWNtcp/NxuDzDeSJQg==; 5:0B3e2CU/zPfDaQhTtZux5qE+0ApbhoqSHSJ7krs1agAJbB/8Q2PAJjCoyTC46GQNURranuA3zfD3qUlRHEBVv3aKpNUAfDwgjk1uD5qhsp11tkS16pAQRZ3xCMQn4rhuxR4wPvBHS9cK/hk5ahEasQ==; 24:cYQqcBbIp8anClzjwyUIRoKLEClgTwmE4zJtNmYqPUZGYeB5xPZjRaWicsQEsX43kw6yOSV2scktDStdaKOLE58IbkFhlFVY0uEZlpZt1tQ=; 7:9Ovhz68GF02H4s3ebqwMkyXUYYbv5wmAgcaud2Dh0Maa9zjPAWE8PYvmtH2cCzVb+mzCCZcI8TiF7obs80xmscvNRheVGSKQvWkhIjgsFgbJ4H//bfQMOdiVE0rn2ViSe+nqxenf4k3iH9rYZOphJMPg1ROgqtgX5Qv5eizgT5gQ0Fl4Hverk6pcuBI0/cHsIUqhCUlLsMPhJWMog6JqnQGOrjraKaK29SltVlqBiyM=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;SSOR;
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(189002)(24454002)(377454003)(199003)(3846002)(106356001)(101416001)(14454004)(33656002)(83716003)(81156014)(5660300001)(66066001)(36756003)(478600001)(97736004)(4326008)(3660700001)(8936002)(53936002)(6246003)(53546010)(102836003)(81166006)(39060400002)(3280700002)(2900100001)(68736007)(82746002)(83506001)(6116002)(25786009)(99286003)(236005)(54896002)(54906003)(6512007)(6306002)(93886005)(230783001)(229853002)(5250100002)(316002)(7736002)(8676002)(2950100002)(6636002)(189998001)(6486002)(2906002)(58126008)(6506006)(1941001)(54356999)(50986999)(6436002)(105586002)(86362001)(110136005)(76176999)(42262002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR05MB2302; H:DM2PR0501MB1438.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 86385395-53ca-4b36-1a18-08d51570372a
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254152)(48565401081)(2017052603219)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:SN1PR05MB2302;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN1PR05MB2302:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008)(21748063052155);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN1PR05MB23022F6FEF42F94B7CA89F20AC4C0@SN1PR05MB2302.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(10201501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123558100)(20161123555025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:SN1PR05MB2302; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:SN1PR05MB2302;
x-forefront-prvs: 04631F8F77
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=prz@juniper.net;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3B6E9C9ED5D3478BAADD0607006EC0ACjunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Oct 2017 15:03:24.7882 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR05MB2302
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/M_FjZTuU2b5vu9jUgS74rl69HHs>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:03:37 -0000

There was already a half-way animated discussion whether we should carry VxLAN natively ;-)

Just saying …

And IMO IETF review would work …

--- tony


<akatlas@gmail.com<mailto:akatlas@gmail.com>> spake:

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net<mailto:erosen@juniper.net>> wrote:
On 10/16/2017 8:01 PM, Alia Atlas wrote:
I don't believe that a document has to be Standards Track to create a registry that will require Standards Track going forward.
It is a bit unusual, but I don't see a process problem.

If our documents get converted to Standards Track, this won't be a problem.  But if they stay Experimental for an extended period of time, an issue could arise the next time we need to allocate a codepoint.   ("Since you have no Standards Track documents, we can't allow you to register any codepoints in registries with "Standards Action" policy.)  So we might want a registration policy that will allow codepoint allocations to be done in Experimental track documents that are accepted by the WG.  Maybe we should change the registration policy to "IETF Review".  That seems to be almost the same as Standard Action, but does not require Standards Track documents.  And it is still eligible for Early Allocation.

True enough.  That could work as well.  I don't see near-term updates to the Next Protocol registry as very likely, but I'd be fine with this approach.

Regards,
Alia

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email