Re: [Bier] WG Meeting Notes

"Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com> Tue, 28 July 2015 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <robmgl@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEBA1B2E8F for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NCLuZphHlQI0 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A051B2EB4 for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=23960; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1438112757; x=1439322357; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=3vaP5s9cYpDbOkutU4GPP3ItkQR7W59Ob5zps3PeCXw=; b=EBj9xVzkBdRI+BsEAPw0hq2VmGczUHVAbvJszv9mu7+0xlIEJrB28y35 UPag5wR9j3ij9BO6Szr0K6K2ikXO4289ohhEW2obLFM6h+ZLauYV98iFc WkdFvs4ChyvPJ8XuPO6ayDxNE1WjuckP4mbvO8VTFn8Rcd8xHPmEC4tzq E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADBACd2rdV/5BdJa1bgkhNVGkGgx25EwmHegIcgT44FAEBAQEBAQF/C4QjAQEBAwEdBgpMBQsCAQgRAQMBAQsdAwICAjAUAwYIAgQOBQgTiAsIujWWHwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLToRWMQYBgmkvgRQFkWuCfQGOBoQdgxKQNyaDfW+BSIEEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,565,1432598400"; d="scan'208,217";a="173364630"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Jul 2015 19:45:56 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6SJjuDD017466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 19:45:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.72]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:45:56 -0500
From: "Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com>
To: "gjshep@gmail.com" <gjshep@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] WG Meeting Notes
Thread-Index: AQHQyJW0bWpQbpYx2Ua1GsOzqndxYJ3xSnoA
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 19:45:55 +0000
Message-ID: <57C3345230A4F94C9B2F5CFA05D7F2BD260A5E74@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <CABFReBq-7AmBM1gAmPQ6bBO3wDCMF2iLAqe-aTNz+E7E1E6FOw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBq-7AmBM1gAmPQ6bBO3wDCMF2iLAqe-aTNz+E7E1E6FOw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.194.137]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_57C3345230A4F94C9B2F5CFA05D7F2BD260A5E74xmbrcdx01ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/NeZRlosmsvgaQ_vWlMUXAQFUvJQ>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WG Meeting Notes
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 19:46:34 -0000

Hi Greg,
>  Maglianna?/Cisco: Title should imply it applies to IPv4/IPv6.
Could you please replace Maglianna with Roberta Maglione?
Thanks
Roberta


From: BIER [mailto:bier-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 7:57 PM
To: bier@ietf.org
Subject: [Bier] WG Meeting Notes

Please read and respond  with approval or corrections. Thanks!
Greg

-----

Welcome, Notewell, Agenda bash                  chairs                          5 min

draft-pfister-bier-mld-00                    Pierre Pfister               10 min
  Pierre presenting

  Draft is so far only? Draft for dynamically tying BIER to IP multicast
  flows (flow overlay layer).

  Targeted for small/averaged sised networks.
  Shep Q: Do you have a specific use case in mind ?
  A: Could be applied to homenet.
  A: Simple not only wrt. scale but also overall solution complexity.

  BMLD queriers, BMLD Queriers
  Slide 6: changes required to MLD.
  Open issues (slide 8): prevent duplicate forwading.
  Prevent duplicated packet from leaving the network.
  Q Shep: Ingres/egres forwarder duplication mechanisms
  are different from each other.

  Maglianna?/Cisco: Title should imply it applies to IPv4/IPv6.

  Andrew Doglanv: Looks like extending BIER domain to access side.
  might be better to enhance BIER itself.

draft-ietf-bier-architecture-01
draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-01 Ijsbrand Wijnands       15 min

Ice presenting
  Implementations should support in parallel 2 bitstring lengths
  to allow migration from one to the other.

draft-ietf-bier-mvpn-01                                   Mahesh Sivakumar      10 min
Mahesh presenting

draft-xu-idr-bier-extensions-02                       Xiaohu Xu                   10 min

Peter from Cisco: BGP draft moved TLV into sub-TLV which is inconsistent
in the encoding scheme to the IGP BIER extensions. Please make it
consistent in encoding.

Ice: Does exactly announce the properties of BIER like the IGP extensions,
networks only running BGP will need this. Looks good. Would like to
see this adopted.

Call for adoption being put onto the list.

draft-eckert-bier-te-arch-01                Toerless Eckert                       10 min

Ice: SI should be changed to sub-domains
Greg Mersky: Do you plan TE encap to also be MPLS?
Toerless: Any encap will work.
Ice: How to route TE from SPF traffic - we announce a different label in the IGP for TE

Call for adoption being put onto the list.

draft-mirsky-bier-oam-requirements-00          Gregory Mirsky                       10 min

No questions.

Call for adoption will be put to the list.

draft-kumarzheng-bier-ping-01                       Gregory Mirsky                       10 min

No questions

draft-zzhang-mpls-icmp-bier-01                     Jeffrey Zhang               10 min

claification question: sam aldrin: TTL exiry - Tunnel Transport Label.
Proposed procedure is that instead of dropping packet it would generate
signaling. This is generalizing whats done for IPv4/IPv6 packets.

XX, Ericsson: BIER packet does not have any IP information.
where is ICMP packet sent to: to local host, from there on it is
label switched to BFIR.

Ice: BFIR is in BIER packet, so should be possible to "send back"
packet equally to how it's done in MPLS networks for ICMP of IPv4/IPv6
packets.

Greg: not working group item yet. will consider WG adoption call.

draft-chh-bier-bier-yang-00                Ran Chen                     10 min