Re: [Bier] AD Review of draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling-12

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 August 2021 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C2D3A3284; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Srco_a4lcbAm; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190F13A3276; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id i6so13536121edu.1; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 08:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zwk3J9GeBRiwfg9rnFoT54AGalpHkzQehXdbiMSNHTg=; b=Mww87eGO2bEkbajrpqG943YvwiLPijzaJlPQXh9iGnuIyHDhbOJAhtjtRV/Nuw3YOv qDYdzB7GjZzbnocJl/R2kI2ZwzqPKnhulMWCPxVdngi5ZPWMTr7ou0MQLwR7iC05LBMm zvrbQxN1AeCEBV/TIKRJmJLPBHNgF1ddV5Nr2tIMSaiO+K1QUE1VELhklzTEudJc7r+l HICsKh+ityWWWPbJ98tSfa/khLASI41tn7jwfuok4EFO5sjEEbJkD8mN9b5JMNYsTs1/ fczH2lLA6CTeSoNPdyshxox93h7XL45scRbJOos/GbgF3wgUrdS8NrPcpTGpK4oSQOMb xTsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zwk3J9GeBRiwfg9rnFoT54AGalpHkzQehXdbiMSNHTg=; b=H+ZXlWw28TajLdExOxQU2b3y103SStUpHA3/rX/Z8e84pw5+T1AN0YR8xopYA08S9P xEtqoMJQXUHZ58c6vfOBZ8xv/R59tnmEdsBn94q9leZlvRoGStD4CRzY+gQZ7gyT5c45 SBpWpCv44eQVXJzfjzP6mxWOy1WcP8qs4GKupB7cJzAonbCcg9VvLoNyJGZnnyhMNd+d cxyoD5RzuLZrqOLLtXjZySiS40QZZMDp0A/f73R/P7WnKi88Z8513VHw2973fU9ySrMJ 1c5zKO8WSMEIpPtDYJAouNz+1ppZJnQAckM0u5zV0r5rtEWa6tBkAqVcLZ+iZ5Ll9Yhc 4c8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iLpKvQVn4MIZ/gyKGGcK4FqB4QFjEBLEkYEuA4seoA8ybcXUk EMaiUcU43rCoUtv+sf104RQk6XMGyDtwcRYs9eA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxu7NZHEbMGZaeVCAJ+BPEVVIB566dMi9YH9hz5TE7Lf/PrqBssmP4UT2KLwjo40mpij/CDe1p5NE/DKRFisM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:40f:: with SMTP id q15mr13779481edv.86.1628262955606; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 08:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 15:15:54 +0000
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR08MB3970B70DBFB8CBDC979B11A491F39@BN7PR08MB3970.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAMMESszXovXDs_-psvfktR0yEv_La+g=hHs0cj8_UFdp32btbQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR08MB39787B86ED6BDCC4DC6C26A191F39@DM6PR08MB3978.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESswKDsEDU1OqFDKnecDD1kGMtNE6EtVXVXB=zA6miQSpfQ@mail.gmail.com> <BN7PR08MB3970B70DBFB8CBDC979B11A491F39@BN7PR08MB3970.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 15:15:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxqOuX4AhJHdj0TvfXwwxw6oSF0NC=Pj1FR07tm+VadRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <hooman.bidgoli@nokia.com>, "draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling@ietf.org>
Cc: Nabeel Cocker <nabeel.cocker@gmail.com>, "bier-chairs@ietf.org" <bier-chairs@ietf.org>, BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/WbjO2Ql1lO4fXQvDbkj44CjkoSM>
Subject: Re: [Bier] AD Review of draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling-12
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 15:16:19 -0000

On August 6, 2021 at 9:54:22 AM, Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote:


...
> HB> how about if we change it to "signaling packet" and in a paragraph
> HB> explain these signaling packets have PIM join,prune packet formats?
> HB> Would that remove the confusion?
>
> Explaining that it is the format and not the packet/function is what is
> needed, but I don't think that a paragraph is enough as there are many
> places in the text that refer to PIM/rfc7761. But, yes, that is the right
> direction.
>
HB2> ok I'll go through the doc and try to change this, I think this will make
HB2> the draft very confusing. But before I do that I think we need to agree
HB2> what we need to call this signaling packet.

Mote important than agreeing on a name is to agree on the changes that
need to be made -- this is not a cut/paste operation.  IOW, hold the
changes until we have talked.


Thanks!

Alvaro.