Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

Linda Wang <lindawangjoy@gmail.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lindawangjoy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C68129423 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 03:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTQeVaWHU5db for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 03:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C28127868 for <bier@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 03:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 142so60116644wma.1 for <bier@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 May 2017 03:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=r6Tii+KS3qhqsNsipZor+oxYg0RtYBpqk6Rjj2+N+aU=; b=KCG59U1WkAFkg0UQdmFVhliMcShJ0q/IjtVKbmhgMAq5Mv7NB8Ex9ArdWkrQATf7Lm 0voC91IP68iFoY+oJM0wGO3fD8a2T9E3TNuSgSufPuFA5bn3GqdJb5fpOre/LVTMwo9+ ia+0s4HB4SzqlpxmSO4n3CN2QSzo3EHVfOm3Wc+F+I0Kh/UYxwt/RXquX4gO3wE2q136 OsoMPJnCPmL3UovxV6ypUq5lfA1XuvWk5H8MIkpDCwCaoc8UTGUgj4JEyHWt2ylI+Dnh 7m8ht7IqIHGsyjKaOAtrgVRXegsUUuZk7dIKxkAMrodu7w0U34a91/ljXgOcGwUm/VLF Gpqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r6Tii+KS3qhqsNsipZor+oxYg0RtYBpqk6Rjj2+N+aU=; b=rxy3A18XcIPLUaDk6kmgsJEg+e5cVOaipFzB5eTQ8HdKaBv1HtLG8uWxBXw1JiSTtH rV5+cM+cuc/r1VHaV3i5W1BLYsGHJ52gnWQrTg4bEXW2CZmGst1GB+y92bwLfKXsF1kE HsH7uawS66pmQDLP2XgborrKUnzy13LrWoChDkuazUognd2n9eb5B2AXlUg6FYxgJnDd EsmLRLP3Jpnh+s4ZQDar72hwymsRVdKIEVOTjpCdzq8ruy0EfqkdU+RlJ9zSGovimBmJ OEP3AksPOBPqJTEZMM0/iL4flTVwKiqD/eJDIAUsa8AToBXEQ3L8UwD2q29s2he1p6GT bKuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4cSlyShsLzXlBOnx66acSCd1gLyVXBwIkVXlrRORc9u2I+cQ5k bfRwwlVaWlHsg4SnnRGEuxWKG+RSFQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.132.145 with SMTP id g139mr11946865wmd.35.1494240269462; Mon, 08 May 2017 03:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.176.92 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2017 03:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linda Wang <lindawangjoy@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 20:43:48 +1000
Message-ID: <CALW7UnEjwJ25v5Pz7M0QWQAMHSQfVjzGqwEVmpaP0pW96p6Wpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11444b667872d1054f00ec6a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/WfvC5xzyj5DECOm4shC6fc7PMwU>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 10:44:32 -0000

 Support.

BRs,
Linda

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:

> At WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for
> some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a
> process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the
> work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is
> that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet
> our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and
> operator support.
>
> This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-architecture/
>
> Please read and respond do this thread. EOWGLC - 20/5/17
>
> Thank you,
> Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>