IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

<arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com> Tue, 09 May 2017 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FA6129405 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 08:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.831
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.831 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nm3gOcgShyIo for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 08:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout1-trp.thomsonreuters.com (mailout1-trp.thomsonreuters.com [163.231.6.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 933E1127241 for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 08:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trpusmneagrly01.int.westgroup.com (relay1 [163.231.22.97]) by mailout1-trp.thomsonreuters.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id v49FN336008811 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 May 2017 15:23:03 GMT
Received: from EAGH-ERFPHUB04.ERF.thomson.com ([10.204.103.213]) by trpusmneagrly01.int.westgroup.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id v49FK19H030501; Tue, 9 May 2017 15:23:03 GMT
Received: from C111GTUHMBX56.ERF.thomson.com ([fe80::71e6:8d9e:a7f4:fe91]) by EAGH-ERFPHUB04.ERF.thomson.com ([fe80::7cd2:1f92:ea27:b57e%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 9 May 2017 09:22:48 -0600
From: arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com
To: gjshep@gmail.com, bier@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
Thread-Index: AQHSxfLZWlyalxnPhUeQBF7vM64QPqHsJCJA
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 15:22:46 +0000
Message-ID: <4A496052E7B7E84A9324854763C616FA328A3F64@C111GTUHMBX56.ERF.thomson.com>
References: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.206.30.3]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4283-8.100.1062-23060.000
x-tm-as-result: No--22.547200-0.000000-31
x-tm-as-matchedid: 8004-8011-143723-150567-139704-113220-708196-111604-70036 2-705718-700345-701827-700264-702497-704425-700732-701012-701306-700450-709 859-111605-700074-303242-188124-702638-106660-188057-706717-701738-700079-8 63828-700752-700040-704048-703352-701236-703712-705388-704351-707182-121111 -700049-700618-139705-706817-700490-111610-106230-700274-188093-148004-1481 33-22102-42000-52000
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A496052E7B7E84A9324854763C616FA328A3F64C111GTUHMBX56ER_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/l3DySW2L4uJ8qcjd9DG12uWLGhU>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 15:23:07 -0000

Support.
Regards,
Arkadiy

From: BIER [mailto:bier-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 6:56 PM
To: bier@ietf.org
Subject: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

At WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and operator support.

This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-architecture/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbier-2Darchitecture_&d=DwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLmy8-1Cr1I4FWIvbLFebwKgY&r=JA6g2ZDvIPLQHZqHQByKQq-jvOcxu4cQskARppQFqZc&m=nCB-NaUrkilIo1Z8TLy6Jrmp_T15Na1V4-MvfbTsMYc&s=LdfUXp3J_hmPMAL9GPjy76f7-Ics0w1L3hwSoMt6U38&e=>

Please read and respond do this thread. EOWGLC - 20/5/17

Thank you,
Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email