IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Meeting Notes 110

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sat, 13 March 2021 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B763A0E9B for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:59:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qtSliKBa1y3 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50F73A0E96 for <bier@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id y1so9525555ljm.10 for <bier@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:59:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CnIJ73l5irHGerxFf+mn20jmJfCCuEXaEXSppzYDSck=; b=TtjzyOcdMnERtv13+iDL0HPdqG1BKiDDUeoigIPgFVd/bEZQVSivODi/G4UdiZPeUn LUs+m8tiD5jJFdiEDZqsSnSAXS2qOwet8ubzfBwumupmlGz+xdPd84ClOqLA2Kxa+Yno Y15E88UVRN+UQ3GqeDLuvtu/xy2xX1Mj4GDuDYFbJgC9tAF43rYShbRLyjY6E8OHyVar Abs5Vuq/rIvNSWh7VHRtM6VyffNAU8Gg/l97MHffpN4hjzG/jTT+70eP1ZG/TqMrc3a3 Cd2wYLFlSa1F0lDO1j0yf5DQxNd3BELHMIRMQuC6hASz7rJoxXC9srkti2sL4XFxaVi8 oaOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CnIJ73l5irHGerxFf+mn20jmJfCCuEXaEXSppzYDSck=; b=ScpgZRley0u+hErBeofaBcfTNxmlOWb/rje6PQSUmjTsHd0+e7ZGuOWOwPgJhFVASE /y9Jq9+ElJOCW5val6OMFjtYtINAEQqMUCCodNu/BA7nwmOQsnf+ezpVBnfNXUfxVdGl LEno2mX5d/KrIdK2GHCsMkvvq0+RdrGspW1DcUKSXw5WZFC0e89HFEoSqIGoe8+NYk7Z ZUgRtlnoPld/QZH/FOPwHZ3OELgW6/N/e34TIJrgSvN5tdiRpZpw0zbSVfFSgdEzjkcB CLZF7dxMEL0SHkqXnikFBDqSjnD7EmpJvlRRYXFibT1wBpoanHSSkjeuLu6nrMfIZqWk sDIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305c65Wg9o/9UtOpIou5g7g8a5sAKaDReZaJqXIEghtGjJnfBon U0yk8yn1gkXJtz7Komnb0V0c+IIn0LB44LXEb8o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiRMt28Sp0u1D1m8xXOx1X3Kco9s62hXuBPhdK1LPBFYJFg+kIoNUIYEMSTWUcyhkSC0SpR9Hd/pWZqALsK8Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9002:: with SMTP id h2mr4041015ljg.145.1615597187426; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:59:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+wi2hPuNL6BCAtwoVdYLf7s_NrqA91xO2w3HisP58Y5+PPxCw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+RyBmW80w6ddnHVJvBcH+WOmmiVA-=2Ye=-nc2pWZoR4u7EVg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hMxeXAbGG+E2vRtH3jBvWd04dqhq+NnArEDci+FhWjL_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hMxeXAbGG+E2vRtH3jBvWd04dqhq+NnArEDci+FhWjL_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:59:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUsf1EHoap2=KYDENWBWuQw5mcL7tzjYB9rAX01a1+TOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Cc: BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074ede005bd60887a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/f2oRnX0hqYqNNCWNtjTZn5maniw>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Meeting Notes 110
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:59:53 -0000

Hi Tony,
thank you for the clarification. If letting the
draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements slip into the abyss doesn't impact the
progress of documents that address particular requirements and reference
draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements, I have no problem with that. If I recall
correctly, Alvaro asked why the solution document,
draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam, is moving ahead of the BIER OAM requirements.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 2:14 PM Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:45 PM Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tony,
>> thank you for taking notes and sharing them with the group.
>> Asking for a volunteer to shepherd draft-ietf-bier-path-mtu-discovery was
>> one of the points I've wanted to convey in the presentation. Other points:
>>
>
> ack, volunteers, line up, no pushing please ;-)
>
>
>>
>>    - Would the WG decide to publish the BIER OAM requirements document
>>    or let it expire and use it as an informative reference in BIER OAM
>>    solution documents?
>>
>>
> since on the last call there was zero response we tend to let it rest as
> "dead wg document". I assume you ok with that. We should not burn IESG
> cycles with stuff that didn't get enoug h attention to go RFC AFAIS
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email