IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Call for WG adoption: draft-chenvgovindan-bier-bgp-ls-bier-ext-01

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Tue, 10 January 2017 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55643129576 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:09:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRg6vzhwtOej for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2952B12952C for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u25so568918334qki.2 for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=rQwLAJVcDS5IvvubWHWdzF9HcnQbAgWM5K8Yz0Ufti8=; b=oaAomkwwzH0Nl6H49jTOyP5qQ6NGaLMRpvAlojaZZAkXjUyDwdEvBk+A3Ezp6sZfcX G2gFiJLVqMz8aXEdJiSv8k1DrRO19rEF7fvN3H3n49EIbKhfRwsCu1XJ+rX1ZM2jyb2f KW3TnDrmT19r1TqjfeQZ7S+hUkiQ56qCUfvCVJHVeCawbmm7kuHc8ZT8YGmL3gD1kKqA QnxNO3pEGDSLAEnhiSRMm+rExGZab0APlYI9wYyZFTYNTrVn2iJnjjYs/N+EMHltDC1b 5WdRTGACwhLCu+uQUSsiLPhpeqW5UtD/RQ/EUExKZMl8Xnpps2Gxu4bUllrLWNoqtKqq sVGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rQwLAJVcDS5IvvubWHWdzF9HcnQbAgWM5K8Yz0Ufti8=; b=gef2DTKhfYEPLyBaPa1vFCCtR3/c4MZG2W7V3wptCIUMfRwQSfY3hOmnfbNtRop4tq Wlp8ifpZSrRk30Huk4TawmH7Zpham0LDKVvPYnzLN+WRyc9LW8iumDgJkitnxoUPsSXM 5R29WgjG6O5RV3UnkmtKBSbfbgTCfunLfnGe8UIcQCaCAAFbkusQPUgczIJKd6FKaZf5 DaiV6zfSsAciEah169C8SCZQYnpQMZOyz5mV383g9vmgGYD85b6Q0T0hDaFph3bsErbs ncTd5vBGVeqnAHAk9NrShXAIaW31dg+biYNTVQ7bcy5pdCry/0xVddo8BssGMfen4jvM fqog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKQL3g+2K6ltTCMWnpASs9aRqrHlWp8yI8GBOfRJFPyOlaiNsVf9e3kqA6YOLI6a8oQySA3QCny3OhWbA==
X-Received: by 10.55.39.193 with SMTP id n184mr4406097qkn.315.1484075336305; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.37.250 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR05MB31452A8071FD0FA7351B2E7AD49B0@DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABFReBoU-aNH_mUyoPsc7n_37hruCE5Yei0sVtnVO4ez=Qrd4A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+RyBmVC9aUD-GGYTLYymL8=AxZg4Yi_6AP0EE=sf2XfBjcO4g@mail.gmail.com> <DM5PR05MB31452A8071FD0FA7351B2E7AD49B0@DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CABFReBqR=u+6wHMfh-Wq51jQ1D_uvbn6P1QTjoeBYn83gk3QWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0949083d92bf0545c237a3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/lCKQnosm_soSoe_NKhg_49aPyi8>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Call for WG adoption: draft-chenvgovindan-bier-bgp-ls-bier-ext-01
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:09:02 -0000

WG,

Looks like we have strong support for WG adoption of this draft. Authors,
please update the name in tools and status as a WG doc.

Thanks,
Greg

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net
> wrote:

> I support the adoption, but the document should clearly describe the use
> case.
>
>
>
> The IGP extensions for BIER signals the following information:
>
>
>
> -          BFR-IDs
>
> -          BIER labels (in the form of label ranges)
>
>
>
> On the surface, it seems to be useful to feed the information to a
> controller (hence the support for adoption). However, in an environment
> where a controller is collecting the information, most likely the
> controller itself (or some siblings) is allocating the BFR-IDs? It’s not
> clear how the collected label ranges could be used either.
>
>
>
> I assume there is a good use case for this – just need to be documented,
> sooner than later.
>
>
>
> Jeffrey
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BIER WG,
>
>
>
> This message begins the call for adoption of:
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chenvgovindan-bier-bgp-ls-bier-ext/
>
>
>
> Please read and reply to this thread. End of call will be Dec 22, 2016
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chairs.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email