[Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work
Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Tue, 10 January 2017 19:09 UTC
Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D5B12952C for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:09:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TExRx3vchiTv for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD6F128B38 for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l7so125807746qtd.1 for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:09:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ap+FBA5OwoZCtJDQwTjn5Bgpcy7Mli/nqDWiaUe/+98=; b=eSFu5QVel9FY3ZpzcevVqGwH3GclV8HsZudOJJlMp/Z3sEAKCR16ZmuzIKYQS4n/dm 4x8si7VN6cDbyIL5cSwS+adtemUljlOlqPT6hhn4hr7RpO3PgqZsnBgUBEFMoCxkX3m0 ELof8IFP7abHEAmap2nqonbldSi/j8+6ypBUBR1iDnUHOdERzEaUayan82sHSmNUG3vU d0m2idxBnmKIC+kePoYcx0gyW6grWlOV09jXNyM62E2xZe5zj7Czta0HI4BUeVHVA50g 7raljf216eL8eHHh77fHFHex15W2pebm47kSz/mJBs/88z7BHkGbsmI8ctaxFDsb+JfP 0SGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=Ap+FBA5OwoZCtJDQwTjn5Bgpcy7Mli/nqDWiaUe/+98=; b=NJNDix8tf5tSPR/QjK7Z4ZwY2Rfuqq8NGq+aiWhm41WKRtyOFFnwddun8IIoxFRFR3 0UgcuFulPqbcyMTY+HeHUP23tEhK7ebrLLBFmPLJuD+B7HcS1/SKOXH5e+wl7WjFWVdn eWIV6897SPSNgQfTV/2hFV+2DJt74Pa8quQ1yx3hxdn5HoK8fL/8WB1oy8cmbzkc8UK4 n4krR+NeabDLOkoc7oKjf4Vg9whi4odebOZMD5RdstO2ZOIUja74Oisgt5eJAXe6O+d2 ZXEPMnRUuQM0CGXKmFx58kuMcyaWwoHFTbljrP1UKwEX6Hqky10PkDkYTvrNaGPiCW9v aSsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKd6mJ1uAM8LzrlgDitBhW0X1N2L0lRBrftb+S3rGMqqjFw3kYQRPrQ+WVt61iDwpyAMDjjDeKDldlQbw==
X-Received: by 10.200.38.196 with SMTP id 4mr1965499qtp.96.1484075377840; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:09:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.37.250 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:09:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:09:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CABFReBr28gGCd+gm0fATYDugYtdW5JJnu30RUBg035hS6Z44_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f4790b758b90545c23973"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/FlnlLbLof5TcwEPPo_49Gfs3KpI>
Subject: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:09:43 -0000
*, There are several expiring WG drafts which need to be addressed. Let's take a look at these and see if any of them represent complete work. At our last meeting it was suggested that we potentially have docs which could be advanced to WGLC, but wouldn't have to go into the Editor's Queue yet, pending the WG's completion of the reqs to recharter all of our work into the Proposed Standards track. I suggest we start with this list of expiring docs to either advance to WGLC or rev/refresh as necessary: draft-ietf-bier-architecture draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions draft-ietf-bier-ospf-extensions draft-ietf-bier-ping draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam draft-ietf-bier-path-mtu-discovery The MPLS encap draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation/ ..should now represent the consensus on our unified encapsulation. This too could be a candidate for WGLC MVPN draft was just rev'd: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mvpn/ Please read and respond to the list with any issues. Thanks, Chairs (Greg)
- [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work Greg Shepherd
- Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work Greg Shepherd