IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Thu, 12 January 2017 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB31128AB0 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:06:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ms6h9YP5dgFs for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:06:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71E512950F for <bier@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u25so28917520qki.2 for <bier@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:06:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=f/Y+N+B1znTOoHr3wVPb4nuY8KwOXHKQU7mVzfOcEMA=; b=gUH59V/n5FfBg1Rr3W3VEZeNysn/tA9O5kYz5l+qd2EZ5Z08UCSiDt6juwYREzOKwA D7N747db/vffpQ2njJM8K0Ce7+ve4ZlX+lFtsDv3CEpjEDpZjjRcEis4ABCkRb15yDm3 bJRXgdY/6OQpxlFw/D4Pj6GLiHBGiTolpHcmhmnNSJdM3i4s4O+Mv8FfN8P7Et9R18yb jtNVNHisn0QVrxreIxweOHEXmIXMZDSpiKztXysidqwK7b48maLWoKdb0KKxdwLWWxCT TrGf7Po95YUMxTLVjAfAIgUpy5q17i+V78N1ZU7TuOXXjLcdKjt2bBzd0jedZfNPVbXb QFHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=f/Y+N+B1znTOoHr3wVPb4nuY8KwOXHKQU7mVzfOcEMA=; b=ouOT8eGjLQvZP9sWx3PZ2YpONtDXxjhSddwEL4ctYCgoOgW6OJebMgODDvTzhwI1cX vm2tXlrlJqDINSLlvkPm4/isU3++PLh848p7H/fTZfzSOLFgfxOXTLMLbXTlb8Qus8pD kh+JfcdfMzaFRC5vUwdaOPCtMAvJNQUgGyL/XwW+xpVhldztX2Ogc8U1usgrAfwbIeVg qhcTDHSr++A9w7q8gJmf3IvY3iNKtjgFBrnRqV+3tisG66Au98AHWmjUhtlZ0hxxMzU9 FRkd/whSdi5+NJCU9g9LpF6iz3W+GjJuyMzIYHxxVhgMD5nM5S50I9aVUzLA1SYddrVH nEXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLb4Dxp85lHRMDObiUy+CdjnifwpeWlA9G7HvKSU2+osVoiSxZgSvRRREUSZRbqeTvNMRnoLd+SHjVV9w==
X-Received: by 10.55.78.73 with SMTP id c70mr15510916qkb.11.1484244366963; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:06:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.42.124 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:06:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmUf+uDyk4PS74jKaWd5iXSdRMS1y4M+DPxBCp6x0pd1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABFReBr28gGCd+gm0fATYDugYtdW5JJnu30RUBg035hS6Z44_A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+RyBmUf+uDyk4PS74jKaWd5iXSdRMS1y4M+DPxBCp6x0pd1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:06:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CABFReBpFmRyJxyP72sknJa_7bESjgB0Yg_7Rq=HVjgZ-D9X=4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a7f0e40bb7a0545e992c7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/n4hbRTA1DNB8H5q_avDfa7Vgmc8>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:06:11 -0000

Thanks Greg. Will do.

Greg

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Greg, et. al,
> I'll refresh draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam and draft-ietf-bier-path-mtu-discovery
> shortly.Would WG Chairs consider adding draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements
> to the list of candidates?
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> *,
>>
>> There are several expiring WG drafts which need to be addressed. Let's
>> take a look at these and see if any of them represent complete work. At our
>> last meeting it was suggested that we potentially have docs which could be
>> advanced to WGLC, but wouldn't have to go into the Editor's Queue yet,
>> pending the WG's completion of the reqs to recharter all of our work into
>> the Proposed Standards track.
>>
>> I suggest we start with this list of expiring docs to either advance to
>> WGLC or rev/refresh as necessary:
>>
>> draft-ietf-bier-architecture
>> draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions
>> draft-ietf-bier-ospf-extensions
>> draft-ietf-bier-ping
>> draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam
>> draft-ietf-bier-path-mtu-discovery
>>
>> The MPLS encap draft:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation/
>> ..should now represent the consensus on our unified encapsulation. This
>> too could be a candidate for WGLC
>>
>> MVPN draft was just rev'd:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mvpn/
>> Please read and respond to the list with any issues.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chairs
>> (Greg)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BIER mailing list
>> BIER@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email