IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE391127333 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c-rkyldHmak0 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x242.google.com (mail-pg0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F333124B0A for <bier@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x242.google.com with SMTP id s62so12334023pgc.0 for <bier@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 May 2017 14:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:references :in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=rlVaPAMZq+RlaL/DIpYOyZ67obRa52zeTUp3DUPSFj4=; b=XKowOoaM38wY9FLpV6xgFzmQI1YM2dMWPV2srtZ8ItqYQHhoc30INfmTkAsMd+/tzp vLnsOkRIPBKZz+t/dLpW8dJdU5ROmrPQwugaiYZ3dc2KBJMqwa5xADmHVV41fNaYcvDV a2keUrfrwvgfQMvbW6bpRt9ppzGrgszxPUaDKZival60XyYUbRq7C1yj3gOCyfN8zwPk rjazd+f6SSrA4ygBGghAnIqR6svJh7ulV8NjltHuYwfCGI3AHVw2Drnz1QQwfBxq0axc LxGE74uSCgVCHxkZamMHhClaIdQeuquBj4ZSZi5u41vBhcTSP9Vhv8uMPLceF5EAs4Jd 80ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=rlVaPAMZq+RlaL/DIpYOyZ67obRa52zeTUp3DUPSFj4=; b=K+G9LjJ/VQg+5NaUY89WvW0+a64KgNHbnQKUrh7GZ7WFBnQ6Jp2MUst/PjP42EPeju B4kBVKA1GAB3zs41eLhtlABc6G5AeSRKNjDhQj0n9hLdSw/F+jmEJGjWRX/MgCLcgbA5 dUN6wFdZpC8/kU2ZI2JabXIDfK7GXOS6gk+ZAMHxzvpNTb11Hqz7mqVnZpqW9wLCRJs7 4WqBCvZ+6cDwIRU8ReUqs2H4CPxbqGgezEWzNKu1KckZOLNUm9rI/AqcWS0I+aPtg9H2 8mOGZikoOVkqg7xfY8HF2aAAus+Z7qf4vpFsvxlHEB1Pb5KVlPZqhYZ/YpBQosM8zvFn VLLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcB+VUIPvdiqLLWmFjI9tUHvTaRWPcBF0zDLb/LA9BDdf4SkJi9P V89MzMc2aFo8ZG8N
X-Received: by 10.98.16.28 with SMTP id y28mr8429561pfi.163.1494279963827; Mon, 08 May 2017 14:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.253.164] (107-1-141-74-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [107.1.141.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l3sm27103009pfj.130.2017.05.08.14.46.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 May 2017 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 14:46:01 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: gjshep@gmail.com, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <8DE20AA3-D951-4E69-8C67-86C2CC0AE017@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
References: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3577099562_2150321072"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/ty-wyYoplUoPFREneLFlZU6RRUU>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 21:46:06 -0000

yes/support

 

Cheers,

Jeff

 

 

From: BIER <bier-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, May 5, 2017 at 15:56
To: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

 

At WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and operator support.

 

This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-architecture/

 

Please read and respond do this thread. EOWGLC - 20/5/17

 

Thank you,

Chairs

_______________________________________________ BIER mailing list BIER@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email