Re: [Bier] Re: Questions about a few MSR6 related drafts

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Mon, 08 November 2021 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9FA3A0FB8; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 05:08:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFRz1kGQuv8K; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 05:08:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF903A0CC9; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 05:08:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id z26so1596169iod.10; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 05:08:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=geSwXuNw88RBtivQxnYhBMwKWIYajAD5Bsi171kb6qI=; b=R4sejN0uxRsHihcJ91kZsLSVcftMOPrq2Ai/lPF4IHQA82std4Kp0Vp5YmrS2GPYd/ J2GPnPCGqcjh5JOI0q9yQrxW3zrGnEdGcVeUnIatQ7VI5282hdpvrdWQIFv0Nbk6fDTM iDgmkQB2cAIpGeVt2ATjRJDisV9wcH2LFevpMVoX5AbuPqZIMZodyANxcW88S12eJrI0 UE4HtT36iG/nmjzdN0kgLkh+679j3Rq+9xMZ3xVo13BUEo8vLKa+BCqoXYAZ0FY20kZv yMT4PBtbRqrkbMJlt93o6GjAomfDn6PpTqvxVGC0M/B6uFHiJQy5hKc8+5oXkj6dVviQ f2uA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=geSwXuNw88RBtivQxnYhBMwKWIYajAD5Bsi171kb6qI=; b=zfHhW1vBM2Y8B52ct5+yXLXJ2MZaKrRRH6FbTVu0v4oB1r+c2YRfpo5AS7ACUw1RSy jeSyA3apqo2q1ZVluwguSK/JRAbhrdTI9XuBQ9yguEM357Shanendqy2vEhw0P6+Tyym 95IxzjQ7aO/eHd4pzp8bTnCbx92b1lhvGWO1/TOxc+xv02oCtQaq1scUHIzQIineNjlO vRloYO4UP3NohMejI4RvZgOMC9FEyQa5ErUig4VsmmHQBTCmM5+dgRnTgj7Xmxz/lXs8 uRj11aQKKvDVn1eVjQiEsyYyZRU6Br0vvvZ6/pfGgR0MjpNoGmjEr7ySSNVoENjBEx6T jhNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dZixbaXm54f74P0cUfwbmHEcPUMoqHd5s/X/ToeN8Zysihzdt khDcuyAts2lc9jynEsgAZngHjAib/tyK+yYjtbE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTgu/6g/j2JEise044s3oNJyBKQFWFSbvqReltqIviUOkKFyt7kPe17AiahmtVtBpMwyZ1gyGnKQhBS2qP9Mo=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8884:: with SMTP id d4mr13346398ioo.137.1636376880027; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 05:08:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211108172030634555480@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211108172030634555480@chinamobile.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:07:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hMoWT-utKbM8qTBQjOeGi6CLeoi-qMampmoub4JqMJxLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>
Cc: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>, pim <pim@ietf.org>, bier <bier@ietf.org>, "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>, "Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <gengxuesong@huawei.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a71bb205d046aefc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/xDE5YqcCIfCdphledFA0e67UjyQ>
Subject: Re: [Bier] =?utf-8?q?Re=EF=BC=9A_Questions_about_a_few_MSR6_related_?= =?utf-8?q?drafts?=
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 13:08:08 -0000

It would be nice if you could publish an .ics file as soon as viable.
juggling too many timezones and missed things more than once ...

-- tony

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 10:21 AM Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jeffrey and WG,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your interest in MSR6! We will have a MSR6 side meeting on
> Friday 13:00-14:30 UTC for this topic and we could discuss these questions
> in the side meeting. We also would like to request withdrawal of the 2 MSR6
> related presentation in PIM in order to gather all the discussions together
> and avoid repeating.
>
> The information of side meeting could be found:
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/112sidemeetings, and welcome
> to join!
>
> Best Regards
> Yisong
>
>
> 发件人: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net>
> 时间: 2021/11/06(星期六)03:54
> 收件人: pim <pim@ietf.org>;Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
> <gengxuesong@huawei.com>;Xiejingrong (Jingrong) <xiejingrong@huawei.com>om>;
> Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>;Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>;Toerless
> Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>;liuyisong <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>om>;
> 抄送人: bier <bier@ietf.org>rg>;
> 主题: Questions about a few MSR6 related drafts
>
> Hi,
>
> I see draft-geng-msr6-traffic-engineering is on the agenda for PIM WG in
> this IETF. I have a few questions on the relationship among some drafts.
>
> - This MSR6 TE draft (draft-geng-msr6-traffic-engineering) mentions BIER
> and that "MSR6 needs to reuse the advantages of SRv6 and BIER to implement
> source routing". However, it does not really seem to make use of BIER (or
> BIER TE) forwarding. Rather, it seems to be a bit similar to
> draft-chen-pim-srv6-p2mp-path. Can you clarify the relationship among MSR6
> TE, BIER, BIER TE and draft-chen-pim-srv6-p2mp-path?
>
> - There is another MSR6 BE (Best Effort, draft-lx-msr6-rgb-segment) draft
> that I don't see on the agenda. It also mentions BIER and does make use of
> BIER forwarding. Can you clarify the relationship between MSR6 BE and
> BIERv6?
>
> I notice that the MSR6 BE/TE draft names do not yet have PIM in them. Is
> it because we're not yet sure where they belong?
>
> Thanks.
> Jeffrey
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>