Re: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.txt> (Tethering A BIER Router To A BIER incapable Router) to Proposed Standard
"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Mon, 08 April 2024 16:20 UTC
Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718C0C151547; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.953
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.08, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b="JJ8O+QVR"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b="OwBkTenj"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BsqR7uNrnsfr; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA680C151545; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=43118; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1712593232; x=1713802832; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xxOGZGsqVFJbu4haNan9w2Vy9NF4NstgKZJkxm3xcmA=; b=JJ8O+QVRCYLdQ9vwifc2kES9BS3yadsHNraKASv5fCXW3DqlLjt1+xUq c9YugSJddTDuf4gKZ4bomgDym8nTTMLgz8iVVpcFKlgVJjBkWvHHzNs4N DxgQC+RbMV21CWDKKQ0bHxffXvn6ktY4TinKHkVOBExyUOeVSoSsJud// c=;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CeyZBUV5ShqdDzvnlto/Xg==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: JKUskx0eSVmfUi9qAcVMBw==
X-IPAS-Result: A0ABAAA6GBRmmJldJa1aGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQFlgRYEAQEBAQELAYFAMVJ6AoEXSASEUYNMA4ROX4hrA5FCjEUUgREDUQUHCAEBAQ0BAS4BCgsEAQGFBgIWh34CJjQJDgECAgIBAQEBAwIDAQEBAQEBAQEGAQEFAQEBAgEHBRQBAQEBAQEBAR4ZBQ4QJ4VtDYZZAQEBAQIBAQEQEQoTAQEsCwEEBwQCAQYCEQQBASEBAgQDAgICJAsUCQgCBAENBQgagl4BghclIwMBEJUgj08BgUACiih6gTKBAYIKAQEGBAWBT0HbZAMGgUgBiCYBgVICAoheJxuBSUSBFAFCgmg+gmEBAQIBgSgBEgEjFQ8GAYMuOYIvhlyJKYNKQYEbPYEYgRtLdBmGE1R3IgMmMxQPAhEBVRUOMAk6DwwaAhsUDSQjAiw+AwkKEAIWAx0UBDARCQsmAyoGNgISDAYGBlsgFgkEIwMIBANQAyBwEQMEGgQLB3WCAIE9BBNHEIEyBooTDIF9gQwCBSMpgU4pgREYgwsLQ3GBHgKCCQNEHUADC209NQYOGwUEHwGBGQWbSwE8AYF4ChAtLmoEJywgAjkgHU0YNQuWM0mLKUeOBJMFgX4KhBOMDocdjjYXhAWMfphMZJhiII1UlTsKBBgDhQMCBAIEBQIPAQEGgWQ6a3BwFTuCMwEBATFSGQ+NfiIJAw0JFoNChRSUKngCOQIEAwEKAQEDCYpoAQE
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:7sjIixEPnBPTKKIHMckaRJ1GfuoY04WdBeZdwpMjj7QLdbys4NG/e kfe/v5qylTOWNaT5/FFjr/Ourv7ESwb4JmHuWwfapEESRIfiMsXkgBhSM6IAEH2NrjrOgQxH d9JUxlu+HToeVNNFpPGbkbJ6ma38SZUHxz+MQRvIeGgFY/UlM66ze+a8JzIaAIOjz24Mvt+K RysplDJv9INyct6f7w8yBbCvjNEev8Dw2RuKBPbk0P359y7+9ho9CE4hg==
IronPort-Data: A9a23:I5EzY699GgR/3oqKLnjMDrUDX36TJUtcMsCJ2f8bNWPcYEJGY0x3z mVKDT+PPveNajHzfY0kYIi+9U4E65GBmoQxGlBtpSxEQiMRo6IpJzg2wmQcns+2BpeeJK6yx 5xGMrEsFOhtEzmE4E/ra+C9xZVF/fngbqLmD+LZMTxGSwZhSSMw4TpugOdRbrRA2bBVOCvT/ 4utyyHjEAX9gWIsbjpEs/vrRC5H5ZwehhtJ5jTSWtgT1LPuvyF9JI4SI6i3M0z5TuF8dgJtb 7+epF0R1jqxEyYFUrtJoJ6iGqE5auK60Ty1t5Zjc/PKbi6uCcAF+v1T2PI0MS+7gtgS9jx74 I0lWZeYEW/FMkBQ8QgQe0EwLs1wAUFJ0JTKMEqVjPLO9E3ff1f+3fNqEEZxDYJNr46bAUkWn RAZACoGYhbGjOWszffhDOJtnc8kasLsOevzuFk5kmqfVqlgEMuFGviRjTNb9G9YasRmEvfYf MAUczVHZxXbaBoJMVASYH47tL313SGhKmEI9Dp5o4IVwFXIzxwp3YPTNdToe42TbM5ru2yH8 zeuE2PRWUxCa4fFllJp6EmEivXGkz++WY8OGviy9/NwxUGe2mweEjUXWEe15/6jhSaWUdNSM WQV9zYg668o+ySDRNjwRVizoHeFpAU0WtdMHas98g7l4qvZ/wjcD24CSSNHY9EOtcIqS3otz FDht9fgHiAqu7SRTVqc+6ua6zSoNkAowXQqfyQIS04O5MPu5dt1hRPURdElG6mw5jHoJd3u6 xuHvRoUuotOts4S24mp41bDnzXrlpecG2bZ+T7rdm6i6wp4YqusaIqp9UXX4J58wGCxEwnpU J8sxZL20QweMaxhghBhVwnkIV1Ez+yOPDuZill1Etx7sT+s4HWkO4tX5VmSxXuF0O5aKFcFg 2eK5Wu9AaO/2lPwPcebhKrqVqwXIVDIT4iNaxwtRoMmjmJNXAGG5jpyQkWbwnrglkMh+YlmZ s7BLJ/wUyZCVv42pNZTewv7+eJ2rszZ7T6CLa0XMzz2uVZjTCfMFudbagfmgh4RtfPZ/m05D Oqzx+PRlk0AC7ehCsUm2YUSNlsNZWMqHoz7rtcfd+iIZGJb9JIJVZfsLUcaU9U9xcx9z76Ql lnkAxMw4ASk3xXvd17VAk2PnZuyB/6TW1phY3x1VbtpslB+CbuSAFA3KcFuJeV2rrILIDwdZ 6BtRvhsy89nE1zv0z8cdpL66odlcXyWacimZkJJvBBXk0ZcejH0
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:6lvwkKOVFqz/XMBcT4H255DYdb4zR+YMi2TDiHoBKiC9I/b5qy nxppUmPEfP+UcssREb9expOMG7MArhHO1OkPks1NaZLUbbUQ6TXeNfBOTZskDd8kHFh4lgPO JbAtZD4b7LfBZHZKTBkXWF+r8bqbHtntHM9IPjJjVWPH5Xgspbnn9E43OgYzdLrX59dOEE/f Snl6x6jgvlU046Ku68AX4IVfXCodrkqLLKCCRtOzcXrCO1oXeN8rDVLzi0ty1yb9pI+9gf2F mAtza8yrSosvm9xBOZ/XTU9Y5qlNzozcYGLNCQi+AOQw+cyjqAVcBEYfmvrTo1qOag5BIBi9 /XuSotOMx19jf4Yny1mx3wwAPtuQxeqEMKiGXow0cLk/aJAA7SOPAxwr6xtSGprXbIiesMlZ 6jGVjp7qa/QymwxBgVrOK4JC2C3nDE00bK19RjzkC2leAlGeVsRUt1xjIPLH8NcRiKnbwPAa 1gCtrR6+1Rdk7fZ3fFvnN3yNjpRXgrGAyaK3Jy8PB9/gIm1EyR9XFoj/A3jzMF7tYwWpNE7+ PLPuBhk6xPVNYfaeZ4CP0aScW6B2TRSVaUWVjibWjPBeUCITbAupT36LI66KWjf4EJ1oI7nN DEXElDvWA/dkryAYmF3YFN8BrKXGKhNA6dh/129tx8oPnxVbDrOSqMRBQnlNahuewWBonBV/ O6KPttcrbexKvVaPB0NlfFKu1vwFElIboohuo=
X-Talos-CUID: 9a23:mLyR3mFq8x9xCNOIqmJM+V8mMP0bL0bd1Xv8MVG+DXpuD42aHAo=
X-Talos-MUID: 9a23:YIE6xAqciDlxen0UEZMezxNBCdxr8/yjM34In6gH6tCtPhJVESjI2Q==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2024 16:20:30 +0000
Received: from alln-opgw-5.cisco.com (alln-opgw-5.cisco.com [173.37.147.253]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 438GKUV1027921 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 8 Apr 2024 16:20:30 GMT
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DuAwnrMGQ4+GLpeSYBojiQ==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: dobVN21dROy5OXqqSVV1+g==
Authentication-Results: alln-opgw-5.cisco.com; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@cisco.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=ginsberg@cisco.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) d=cisco.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,187,1708387200"; d="scan'208,217";a="6912414"
Received: from mail-dm6nam04lp2040.outbound.protection.outlook.com (HELO NAM04-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) ([104.47.73.40]) by alln-opgw-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2024 16:20:30 +0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HyLZP00f7JFyZXcE2+f2egSF7aVLutYZ2mLpfXEpE8Vl2evU9e/wKnbV6F0z/P2xkYIKzVqhPGU8F56jBXbltToNT/F8jY/Bfc3pZCJo4E5OFpIddT4hOrRvhGxB5jvmgUlkLV+kqCXfmor3OtlAggaw3SiqptVlLX6w9UF1FUJfKPzLoiCOtXDwg9gRG8/P+u8yBDRj1i6V5pdat3x2pACPtuidGmCQUW+pAqJPMOun6MDLrPbXwilmq3a7thOOpyZ+q86Bw1VDHgUGsWG81qcG/67RXHQV1zGtHGU2wFUrYi3J/5eX0GOwBwd7mPfhMVdOioVmAJOCJiHA6eXXjw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=xxOGZGsqVFJbu4haNan9w2Vy9NF4NstgKZJkxm3xcmA=; b=a2KFlB/QPDc7CRbvveMbbHh9g3R2m9vB/D0oHWDkxcrDCN5G9M1MhrhYVK6yQO1g/mMLVABzv1jUmxceR1b4eMTYscqnHnBgKGzsKqv8NLKxpsyeo5skpTbp4caH0MroPVFzzTSaJzg49KHr04zFjPylctCTjd0o60y9pPdbyaMPsmMUHzewUPTloZ06hlpZXU+VdPos5wXQ/UkjAOeeFGhxCrh9VqhIauY93F854IPptDP0kbj6tkMw7ajBK+Kkt27R0MCvHziq2TzjBeVQykmyGKqzLT6JDu7gasW72odLHeQv/QJlIIGNunM93AQdJ54l8Hy7P/h3gcvRPKI7+A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xxOGZGsqVFJbu4haNan9w2Vy9NF4NstgKZJkxm3xcmA=; b=OwBkTenjLZTTAILsg+ZHaOSdENb82K+EWi03zL/8fxr4joIJkLb2YCuWgD9oxBOD4aL362rBPFHs+ZCYADL7rjfujeW/btj7D4EsVus6q9S59VpIrIx0DTOjA3SS8lASi309mf1fJjEgASRSI5+8AydnY7INbwf7gpldOhmgTPw=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c1::14) by DS0PR11MB7560.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:8:14b::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7452.25; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 16:20:28 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::563f:b91e:1a5b:6c48]) by BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::563f:b91e:1a5b:6c48%5]) with mapi id 15.20.7472.007; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 16:20:28 +0000
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: "andrew-ietf@liquid.tech" <andrew-ietf@liquid.tech>, "bier-chairs@ietf.org" <bier-chairs@ietf.org>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, "chen.ran@zte.com.cn" <chen.ran@zte.com.cn>, "draft-ietf-bier-tether@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bier-tether@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.txt> (Tethering A BIER Router To A BIER incapable Router) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHaYBqs4F3cMQ17fkO+oCL+srdt/7Faj7NQgAQq6oCAABEwkA==
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 16:20:28 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB4337B11B4CB33E0C73FB1A19C1002@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <170800694057.2168.264514412767158496@ietfa.amsl.com> <BY5PR11MB433786495B233499026876BCC1032@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <IA1PR05MB95509197C56B33B6359783EED4002@IA1PR05MB9550.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <IA1PR05MB95509197C56B33B6359783EED4002@IA1PR05MB9550.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=5953b05b-f2a0-487a-baaf-6bfc326abdee; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2024-04-08T13:33:14Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4337:EE_|DS0PR11MB7560:EE_
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230031)(376005)(366007)(1800799015); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY5PR11MB4337B11B4CB33E0C73FB1A19C1002BY5PR11MB4337namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c3d57ab9-2e0f-46b2-fdf0-08dc57e7cdba
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Apr 2024 16:20:28.0353 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: fAaO+37IVQmq2Dd0kWSyAxNMdUOHFakgtn2zluxCBLfP8I2cLDPB3AapKeW835f5VvCfOK6F2TMMMzj6qh/jEA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DS0PR11MB7560
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.147.253, alln-opgw-5.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/ylqMlcukw_RtfU83yv_QmjC9G7o>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.txt> (Tethering A BIER Router To A BIER incapable Router) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 16:20:36 -0000
Jeffrey - Thanx for the prompt response. (Better than me. 😊) Please see inline. > -----Original Message----- > From: BIER <bier-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang > Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 7:03 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>; last-call@ietf.org; IETF- > Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> > Cc: andrew-ietf@liquid.tech; bier-chairs@ietf.org; bier@ietf.org; > chen.ran@zte.com.cn; draft-ietf-bier-tether@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.txt> (Tethering A BIER > Router To A BIER incapable Router) to Proposed Standard > > Hi Les, > > Thanks for your comments. Please see zzh> below for clarifications. > > > Juniper Business Use Only > -----Original Message----- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 6:36 PM > To: last-call@ietf.org<mailto:last-call@ietf.org>; IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>> > Cc: andrew-ietf@liquid.tech<mailto:andrew-ietf@liquid.tech>; bier-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:bier-chairs@ietf.org>; bier@ietf.org<mailto:bier@ietf.org>; > chen.ran@zte.com.cn<mailto:chen.ran@zte.com.cn>; draft-ietf-bier-tether@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bier-tether@ietf.org> > Subject: RE: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.txt> (Tethering A BIER > Router To A BIER incapable Router) to Proposed Standard > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > This draft is at a minimum underspecified and has some technical errors in the > encoding which should be addressed prior to publication. > > There is no discussion as to what the "address" should be in the proposed > "BIER Helped node" sub-sub-TLVs. > I would presume that what should be used is the "Router-ID" as specified in > the various protocols - but there is no mention of this and I think there should > be. > > Zzh> The draft does say the following: > > The Type is TBD1 (in the case of ISIS), TBD2 (in the case of OSPFv2), > of TBD3 (in the case of OSPFv3). The Value field starts with a one- > octet Priority field, followed by a one-octet Reserved field, and > * then the Address of the Helped Node (X). The Length is 6 for IPv4 > * and 18 for IPv6 respectively. > > Zzh> I can add "4 or 16 octets" to the following figure to make it explicit: > [LES:] MY confusion is not with the size of the addresses - it is with what addresses for a given node should be used. I would think you want to use advertised Router IDs - just asking for that to be mentioned. Otherwise, I do not know how you expect the various helper nodes to advertise the same address(es) for the same helped node. > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Type | Length | Priority | Reserved | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Address of the Helped Node (4 or 16 octets) | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > As there is provision for IPv4 and/or IPv6, this suggests that a given router > could send two such sub-sub-TLVs - one for each address-family. But there is > no discussion as to whether this is allowed nor is it discussed what would > happen if a given node advertised multiple such sub-sub-TLVs for the same > address family. > > Zzh> The draft does say the following, which should be clear? > > ... The helper node (BFRx) MUST advertise > one or more BIER Helped Node sub-sub-TLVs in the BIER Info sub-TLV in > the case of ISIS or BIER Helped Node sub-TLVs in the BIER sub-TLV in > the case of OSPF, one for each helped node: > [LES:] So, what Helper Nodes are advertising is really a list(sic) of the nodes for which they can act as helper. Your encoding is not optimized for that use. More on that below. > The name as defined in the IANA section is "BIER Helped Node" - but I would > think this was meant to be "BIER Helper Node". (I could argue that a more apt > name would be "BIER Tether Node".) > > Zzh> It is indeed "Helped Node". The Helper node advertises one sub-sub-TLV > for each helped node. [LES:] Ack - after a more careful reading I agree. I tend to think "helped node" is better than "tether > node" or "tethered node" for three reasons: > Zzh> a) the document uses "helper/helped" node throughout. > Zzh> b) seems to me that with "tether node" and "tethered node" it is not as > clear on which one is the helper > Zzh> c) somehow to me the wording "tether" implies directly connected; > though the document started with that scenario, it has been expanded to > include remote helpers. > > > The encoding defined in Section 3.1 needs to be made protocol specific. OSPF > typically pads things to a four byte boundary, but IS-IS does not - which means > the "Reserved" field should not be present for IS-IS. > > Zzh> It is for possible future extension purposes instead of padding. If you say > it is important to save bytes in ISIS signaling, I can remove it but otherwise I'd > like to keep it. Please let me know. [LES:] First, reserving space for possible expansion means we send more bytes than needed. I am not a fan. And since you don’t indicate what the reserved field might be (flags, op code of some sort, ...) the probability that you can add information w/o backwards compatibility issues may be low. The more flexible way of adding extensions would be to support sub-TLVs. Second, if what you are advertising is really a list of helped nodes, one can imagine a more efficient encoding where you can advertise multiple addresses in a single sub-TLV. To do that what you need is an AF indicator (so that the address length can be inferred) and then have a list of addresses. The AF indicator could either be done by having a flag in the encoding - or assigning separate code points for each address family. As an aside, I am wondering what the push is for publishing this as an RFC. Have there been early deployments? I ask because if you do consider encoding changes, this would obviously impact any existing POCs - but given you did not have early allocation of code point I am wondering if that is a practical issue. Maybe move forward w an early allocation of code point, get some deployment experience, and then push for an RFC with better experience. Les > > I am not enamored of this technology - but at this time I will refrain from > commenting further as the WG seems to have decided to go forward. > But please address the comments above. > > Apologies for the lateness of these comments. > > Zzh> Thanks! > Zzh> Jeffrey > > Les > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: BIER <bier-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bier-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of The IESG > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 6:22 AM > > To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>> > > Cc: andrew-ietf@liquid.tech<mailto:andrew-ietf@liquid.tech>; bier-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:bier-chairs@ietf.org>; bier@ietf.org<mailto:bier@ietf.org>; > > chen.ran@zte.com.cn<mailto:chen.ran@zte.com.cn>; draft-ietf-bier-tether@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bier-tether@ietf.org> > > Subject: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.txt> (Tethering > > A BIER Router To A BIER incapable Router) to Proposed Standard > > > > > > The IESG has received a request from the Bit Indexed Explicit > > Replication WG > > (bier) to consider the following document: - 'Tethering A BIER Router > > To A BIER incapable Router' > > <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.txt> as Proposed Standard > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > last-call@ietf.org<mailto:last-call@ietf.org> mailing lists by 2024-02-29. Exceptionally, > > comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org> instead. In either case, please > > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > Abstract > > > > > > This document specifies optional procedures to optimize the handling > > of Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) incapable routers, by > > attaching (tethering) a BIER router to a BIER incapable router. > > > > > > > > > > > > The file can be obtained via > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iet<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iet> > > f-bier-tether/__;!!NEt6yMaO- > gk!BSZTXoy3BEXySKhAl4dKYN2L8dwwp78mkXJMt7S > > 8Qz44ePY-vB12NTqD4fHt9pgsqPZaldvVYKmMJLu2$ > > > > > > The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: > > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3331/__<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3331/__>;! > > !NEt6yMaO- > gk!BSZTXoy3BEXySKhAl4dKYN2L8dwwp78mkXJMt7S8Qz44ePY-vB12NTqD4 > > fHt9pgsqPZaldvVYC2HqNh0$ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BIER mailing list > > BIER@ietf.org<mailto:BIER@ietf.org> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier> > > __;!!NEt6yMaO- > gk!BSZTXoy3BEXySKhAl4dKYN2L8dwwp78mkXJMt7S8Qz44ePY-vB12N > > TqD4fHt9pgsqPZaldvVYLcO-qjO$ > > _______________________________________________ > BIER mailing list > BIER@ietf.org<mailto:BIER@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
- [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.txt>… The IESG
- Re: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Bier] Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- [Bier] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- [Bier] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- [Bier] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- [Bier] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- [Bier] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- [Bier] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- [Bier] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bier-tether-04.… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang