IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bimi] Proposal to Clarify Role of MUA in BIMI Evaluation

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 20 July 2022 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AB0C16ECAA for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Me6DNu1Ft65V for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffalo.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (buffalo.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C9FC18870E for <bimi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F40D2A27B1 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout2.hostinger.io (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3D4362A2730 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:53:05 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1658339585; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=3YEkBNFeojxKu2yiVMHB9nrMbxEruQWMePEeCeo132fPjLJOl2U3pRs36bLeUDFi8TEwnv JQd2QL9mNfL0uHqURYpK8oUjf5QkHWmTkv//D+xb3bsVhw6sJeCIvLNBCBYkM1Z0RfqUuQ RY45lZxsbSMYKFybirYE8kWa0zShL4P+J+QHYoundE4vEmTcVadfnZu1Q3pai5tr2acYzT q8h7Y0YMiZvVB+FgX2kuZKb930wglB6CwnRJ9Youisg6gBUKCyGw0NHBT3Y0pxtEZ5Ag00 cBp1U2N6Qjjp8PxJocCOa7UMNXKSi552bTRZjFsAe95WSkbwkxrtBsGmeDlt3g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1658339585; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=aQXYvJXCbphXqooX6ZBo8xmSdUlUhke93t3UYwptwVE=; b=QuxAcmdieMkq3d+y1qPVNc/msRhqbqcluyeP29UJtV+9x0uvLUyvErDm6rMWj8kKThd8/9 xMJx4sOUZKOw5Fuy3nbZp1OJuv74nEVtpBg7EkruIxQ8mLFE8HQxHkhkEnDP17evNbeYT0 t7Bz98qsJGoa5YO1Bg2lO7u/7mOA/JGGXpUOBb+s9h4ReJ0yJaj5BNKnFvY2FftN2wn8ei ML5WiFG4jSlGNozat8V4oaKUzaWsCtph3YxzZhwwQkwOf7wJPFNpQQ9xWcEkvudzK/tGDf bUyTjv5Nt6aVkWQCFhltRHJmuQX6/btOgrPtG1S0J6AEyiFnpjjLVNMnOXgo4g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-674ffb986c-9ffts; auth=pass smtp.auth=hostingeremail smtp.mailfrom=dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Cold-Cooperative: 1258360d343798b8_1658339585583_125320091
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1658339585583:1884493506
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1658339585582
Received: from gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout2.hostinger.io (gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout2.hostinger.io [35.192.45.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by 100.112.55.242 (trex/6.7.1); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:53:05 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.104] (c-73-170-122-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.170.122.71]) (Authenticated sender: dhc@dcrocker.net) by smtp.hostinger.com (smtp.hostinger.com) with ESMTPSA id 4Lp3Fq1DNYz7YpHR; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1658339584; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aQXYvJXCbphXqooX6ZBo8xmSdUlUhke93t3UYwptwVE=; b=dtOnlQBa+Vm9zh6A2ujjWg1bpVvJpqp51LwS7ol9AhOxr1JAuCvkLkjEOGgrTYU1vkKUYM q93B1FndUgGZB7ofV68pe3TJ7lXDVu8OQ68xexqv9uzHxq/PIM2lKUp77ZdqaMv1EK96sr f9sl94titdRzUdthaemQD6MPiMA7ZoDwwKKMyRPneGVJ7n11DL24WE4r+8GXWvNocI9MQ1 UGImz39kkLgGu2L9rFLu15DldJwbXF8eUYEQWPL0Ef5SfB56dVAnEcVJCmHXWTWy1I4wGD bKlmnv1URm5zARsQb32LTVpWOm1JyQlLdMKvJX6vIv2fhv+bQ+EMNQuSzzH/QA==
Message-ID: <c5fc9352-a4d9-030a-6cca-3162639d53ef@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:53:01 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Language: en-US
To: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
References: <DE61AC51-4BC3-44FF-862D-7D8ADFB3BC29@proofpoint.com> <VI1PR01MB70537BA29DA1F456B858C17FC78C9@VI1PR01MB7053.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <6993E8B6-11A0-4AF3-A94E-044F880E56BC@proofpoint.com> <CAHej_8kjwtGE4rDrXfTpgThOD-jh7t0GK9EUnVjVZT_OJzzsvg@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR01MB705353E36328899609DE2471C78C9@VI1PR01MB7053.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <12a85dfe-664f-d757-0fa2-81f17c8088c2@dcrocker.net> <4e9ab94e-8675-df70-3e4b-00edcedb266e@dcrocker.net> <5DE65D46-853F-4F61-ADA7-20CB5E7E6840@kitterman.com> <7f030278-3f9b-c8ea-f9eb-644f006cded9@dcrocker.net> <CC11EF68-1E27-41CD-AE2D-AC26DA261EAD@kitterman.com> <CAHej_8mNCTw0LpnWTBCpqZJhHQcDgrsC4truK1dD_-HbyVgsWA@mail.gmail.com> <DM8PR14MB5237459AC795AE826FDDA198838F9@DM8PR14MB5237.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <qnuJf0TDr11iFAcB@highwayman.com> <CAHej_8kySKk4_F3eVDRQU4ABjs3JUg4Z9UipTwGJE2nSJQ5SJA@mail.gmail.com> <U4H2IKEmq$1iFAbY@highwayman.com> <CAHej_8khwuig8ykrgUWbWErGRZKL1+sz3RtYFs73OtEcMMwVdQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Cc: "bimi@ietf.org" <bimi@ietf.org>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8khwuig8ykrgUWbWErGRZKL1+sz3RtYFs73OtEcMMwVdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bimi/xKWQzuqMZlTWvlS8ObsL60v5V-8>
Subject: Re: [Bimi] Proposal to Clarify Role of MUA in BIMI Evaluation
X-BeenThere: bimi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Brand Indicators for Message Identification <bimi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bimi/>
List-Post: <mailto:bimi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:53:13 -0000

On 7/20/2022 6:16 AM, Todd Herr wrote:
> There are currently BIMI implementations where the mailbox provider 
> displays logos only when the message is opened, and others where the 
> logo is displayed in the folder list view as well as when the message 
> is opened. An MUA choosing to display logos in the folder list view 
> and caring not a whit for when the sender's messages qualified for 
> BIMI would potentially be about to display a great number of logos,


A potentially significant point, in your comments about the variety of 
existing and future behaviors, is that some implementations do (or will) 
show marks when the marks are no longer valid.


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email