[BLISS] Comments on draft-ietf-bliss-call-park-extension-01.txt
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Fri, 05 March 2010 11:13 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF22228C253 for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 03:13:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6IWAI-agFJY for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 03:13:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4481B28C250 for <bliss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 03:13:17 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7c2dae000007b99-42-4b90e74e2850
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 77.48.31641.E47E09B4; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:13:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.174]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:13:18 +0100
Received: from [131.160.126.173] ([131.160.126.173]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:13:17 +0100
Message-ID: <4B90E74D.7070602@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:13:17 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bliss@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2010 11:13:17.0801 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB6B7D90:01CABC54]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [BLISS] Comments on draft-ietf-bliss-call-park-extension-01.txt
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:13:18 -0000
Hi, a few comments on the following draft: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bliss-call-park-extension-01.txt Abstract: "An additional URI parameter is also described". Replace described with specified or defined. Actually, Informational RFCs cannot define SIP URI parameters. As stated in Section 7.1 of draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis, a standards track RFC is needed. Section 2: s/section 2.15/Section 2.15/ and perform a similar change throughout the document. I guess Section 6 has been included in the document as a historical reference. Can we move that information to an appendix? Cheers, Gonzalo
- [BLISS] Comments on draft-ietf-bliss-call-park-ex… Gonzalo Camarillo