Re: [BLISS] Last call comments on draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-18.

[[e-mail] (Dale R. Worley)]

> From: Shida Schubert <[e-mail]>
> 
> The draft is going through IETF last call not WGLC 
> so any comments you have should be sent to 
> [e-mail]. 
> 
> Detail review is always welcome but you being a 
> co-author of the draft, these comments I think should 
> have been provided sooner to your co-author or 
> included in the ongoing revision that the draft has 
> undergone. 

Yes, my apologies, I've not been keeping up and got quite rushed and
sloppy.  And though I'm an author, I haven't been involved in the
editing cycles for at least a year (after the my list of technical
issues were resolved).

What is the best way for me to proceed?  Most of my items are really
editorial.  One other item has technical content, but I think the real
issue is that an edit has not been fully applied.  The most
significant item is that I think the document would be clearer if a
summary of behaviors related to the "retain option" was added.  Of
course, all of these should be decided by the current authors, but
what is the proper process at this point?

Dale