[BLISS] Automatic Handling Survey
Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> Mon, 29 October 2007 21:22 UTC
Return-path: <bliss-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Imc47-00035o-Pv; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:22:31 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Imc46-000351-U3 for bliss@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:22:30 -0400
Received: from agnada.com ([69.36.182.244]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Imc46-0000Kx-FX for bliss@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:22:30 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (S0106001839eceb7a.vc.shawcable.net [24.80.240.54]) (authenticated bits=0) by agnada.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9TLM4mD020563 for <bliss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:22:04 -0600
Message-ID: <47264EF1.40201@ntt-at.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:21:53 -0700
From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bliss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002
Subject: [BLISS] Automatic Handling Survey
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shida@ntt-at.com
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bliss-bounces@ietf.org
All; In Chicago, there was a suggestion to take one of the milestones and use it as a guinea pig to evaluate the process described in the problem statement draft for its effectiveness and functionality. Problem Statement: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bliss-problem-statement-00.txt Amongst the chairs and the technical adviser, we decided to take up the milestone "Automatic Handling" as a guinea pig. The idea was to conduct a phase 1 (Identify a Feature Group) and Phase 2 (Submit Feature Flows) in a small group (Authors and chairs) and contact various vendors to gather information necessary to identify the problem source. After some discussion, we realized that contacting individuals to collect call-flow wasn't as easy as we initially thought it would be due to the time and effort on the individuals part. So, to get a reasonable amount of feedback to make any fruitful conclusions or suggestion(s) that would ultimately solve the interoperability issues, there was an obvious need to lower the threshold for providing information. To do this, we set-up a web form which should take no longer than 5 minutes to complete. Beside BLISS, we are going to ask SIPForum and participants at SIPit to participate in the survery(web form), with which we should get enough feedback to assess the preliminary problem of the space we are dealing with. If you know somebody that can answer the questions better than you please forward the link below. After we have enough information on the statistics of current implementations in the wild, we can then have a in-depth discussion on the list. And come up with a clear definition of problem space(phase 3) as well as recommendation(phase 4). Below is the link to the web-form, I ask for your feedback and I thank you for your time and participation. http://www.bliss-ietf.org/autohandle/?id=27bl01dn22d Regards Shida _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list BLISS@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
- [BLISS] Automatic Handling Survey Shida Schubert