[bmwg] An improved version of our I-D: draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03
Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Fri, 04 March 2022 15:49 UTC
Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9AC3A14C0 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:49:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4KPN9uH4sIt for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BACE83A14BA for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.145] (host-79-121-41-67.kabelnet.hu [79.121.41.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 224FnJlS075049 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 16:49:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-41-67.kabelnet.hu [79.121.41.67] claimed to be [192.168.1.145]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------J1OB0is3g4IN1TRlvGH2uyWY"
Message-ID: <ccad4a96-5bd4-cfed-0df9-544ada991422@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 16:49:17 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
References: <164640798681.28278.9319187638936616813@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Language: en-US
To: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
From: Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <164640798681.28278.9319187638936616813@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <164640798681.28278.9319187638936616813@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.41.67; helo=[192.168.1.145]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/-CAfl42XsKd4QdzIIDmWRIjrzVU>
Subject: [bmwg] An improved version of our I-D: draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 15:49:43 -0000
Dear Chairs and BMWG List Members,
We have made the following changes:
Added Section 4.3 about the consideration of the cases of stateful
operation.
Consistency checking. Removal of some parts obsoleted by the
previous re-writing of Section 4.4.
Added Section 4.7 about the method for measuring connection tear down
rate.
Updates for Section 5 about the implementation and experience.
Not included in the draft, but I have already done some actual
measurements for the connection tear down rate of Jool. And I also plan
to do some such measurement with iptables.
We would like to present the novelties of our draft (and also some new
measurement results) at the BMWG meeting of IETF 113.
Best regards
Gábor
-------- Továbbított üzenet --------
Tárgy: New Version Notification for
draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03.txt
Dátum: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 07:33:06 -0800
Feladó: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Címzett: Gabor Lencse <lencse@sze.hu>, Keiichi Shima <keiichi@iijlab.net>
A new version of I-D, draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03.txt
has been successfully submitted by Gabor Lencse and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful
Revision: 03
Title: Benchmarking Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using RFC
4814 Pseudorandom Port Numbers
Document date: 2022-03-04
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 16
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful/
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03
Abstract:
RFC 2544 has defined a benchmarking methodology for network
interconnect devices. RFC 5180 addressed IPv6 specificities and it
also provided a technology update, but excluded IPv6 transition
technologies. RFC 8219 addressed IPv6 transition technologies,
including stateful NAT64. However, none of them discussed how to
apply RFC 4814 pseudorandom port numbers to any stateful NAT (NAT44,
NAT64, NAT66) technologies. We discuss why using pseudorandom port
numbers with stateful NAT gateways is a hard problem and recommend a
solution.
The IETF Secretariat
- [bmwg] An improved version of our I-D: draft-lenc… Gábor LENCSE